SENT vs. CLSE
Compare and contrast key facts about AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE).
SENT and CLSE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SENT is a passively managed fund by AdvisorShares that tracks the performance of the Actively Managed. It was launched on Feb 2, 2021. CLSE is an actively managed fund by Convergence Investment Partners. It was launched on Feb 22, 2022.
Performance
SENT vs. CLSE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SENT vs. CLSE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | -6.03% | -5.69% |
CLSE Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF | 5.01% | 20.44% | 35.54% | 17.54% | -3.04% |
Returns By Period
SENT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 0.00%
- 3Y*
- -2.90%
- 5Y*
- -4.28%
- 10Y*
- —
CLSE
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 2.94%
- YTD
- 5.01%
- 6M
- 11.24%
- 1Y
- 32.68%
- 3Y*
- 24.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SENT vs. CLSE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SENT has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than CLSE's 1.56% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SENT vs. CLSE — Risk / Return Rank
SENT
CLSE
SENT vs. CLSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SENT | CLSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.25 | 1.28 | -1.54 |
Correlation
The correlation between SENT and CLSE is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SENT vs. CLSE - Dividend Comparison
SENT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CLSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CLSE Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF | 0.91% | 0.95% | 0.93% | 1.21% | 0.85% |
Drawdowns
SENT vs. CLSE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SENT drawdown since its inception was -30.34%, which is greater than CLSE's maximum drawdown of -16.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SENT and CLSE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SENT | CLSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.34% | -16.45% | -13.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | 0.00% | -4.85% | +4.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.23% | -0.59% | -26.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.69% | -3.73% | -16.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 1.67% | -1.67% |
Volatility
SENT vs. CLSE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT) is 0.00%, while Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) has a volatility of 5.65%. This indicates that SENT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SENT | CLSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 5.65% | -5.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.00% | 10.48% | -10.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 14.54% | -14.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.98% | 13.86% | -0.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.54% | 13.86% | -0.32% |