QPX vs. ATFV

In the year-to-date period, QPX achieves a -3.64% return, which is significantly higher than ATFV's -9.48% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

QPX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than ATFV's 0.55% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) and Alger 35 ETF (ATFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current QPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is comparable to the ATFV Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QPX and ATFV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

QPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ATFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%.

The maximum QPX drawdown since its inception was -34.75%, smaller than the maximum ATFV drawdown of -45.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QPX and ATFV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) is 14.25%, while Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) has a volatility of 17.36%. This indicates that QPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.