PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SENT vs. FFLS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SENT vs. FFLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT) and The Future Fund Long/Short ETF (FFLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SENT vs. FFLS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SENT
AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%-10.91%
FFLS
The Future Fund Long/Short ETF
-5.02%7.49%17.71%2.03%

Returns By Period


SENT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
0.00%
3Y*
-2.90%
5Y*
-4.28%
10Y*

FFLS

1D
0.67%
1M
-1.80%
YTD
-5.02%
6M
-7.49%
1Y
0.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SENT vs. FFLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SENT has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than FFLS's 1.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SENT vs. FFLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SENT

FFLS
FFLS Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
FFLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFLS Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
FFLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFLS Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SENT vs. FFLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT) and The Future Fund Long/Short ETF (FFLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SENT vs. FFLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SENTFFLSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.25

0.68

-0.94

Correlation

The correlation between SENT and FFLS is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

SENT vs. FFLS - Dividend Comparison

SENT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FFLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.92%.


Drawdowns

SENT vs. FFLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SENT drawdown since its inception was -30.34%, which is greater than FFLS's maximum drawdown of -11.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SENT and FFLS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SENTFFLSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.34%

-11.05%

-19.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

0.00%

-11.05%

+11.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.23%

-9.49%

-17.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.69%

-2.87%

-17.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

4.22%

-4.22%

Volatility

SENT vs. FFLS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT) is 0.00%, while The Future Fund Long/Short ETF (FFLS) has a volatility of 3.13%. This indicates that SENT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SENTFFLSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

3.13%

-3.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.00%

6.29%

-6.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

9.26%

-9.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.98%

11.19%

+1.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.54%

11.19%

+2.35%