QLVD vs. LVHD
QLVD (FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund) and LVHD (Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QLVD is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Northern Trust Developed Markets ex US Quality Low Volatility Index, while LVHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QLVD returned 5.87%/yr vs 7.44%/yr for LVHD. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QLVD charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for LVHD.
Performance
QLVD vs. LVHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLVD achieves a 2.90% return, which is significantly lower than LVHD's 10.55% return.
QLVD
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -1.90%
- YTD
- 2.90%
- 6M
- 2.39%
- 1Y
- 8.20%
- 3Y*
- 11.75%
- 5Y*
- 5.87%
- 10Y*
- —
LVHD
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 10.56%
- 1Y
- 13.38%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.44%
- 10Y*
- 8.35%
QLVD vs. LVHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLVD FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 2.90% | 24.21% | 4.67% | 11.57% | -12.09% | 9.04% | 3.00% | 6.26% |
LVHD Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 10.55% | 7.50% | 10.18% | -0.95% | -1.82% | 26.90% | -1.28% | 6.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLVD and LVHD is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2019 | 0.58 |
The correlation between QLVD and LVHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
QLVD vs. LVHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QLVD
LVHD
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Energy
Financial Services
QLVD
LVHD
Industrials
QLVD
LVHD
Consumer Defensive
QLVD
LVHD
Healthcare
QLVD
LVHD
Utilities
QLVD
LVHD
Communication Services
QLVD
LVHD
Consumer Cyclical
QLVD
LVHD
Technology
QLVD
LVHD
Real Estate
QLVD
LVHD
Basic Materials
QLVD
LVHD
-
Energy
QLVD
LVHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QLVD vs. LVHD — Risk / Return Rank
QLVD
LVHD
QLVD vs. LVHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD) and Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QLVD | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.23 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | 2.18 | -1.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.75 | 5.41 | -2.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QLVD vs. LVHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLVD drawdown since its inception was -28.20%, smaller than the maximum LVHD drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLVD and LVHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLVD | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.20% | -37.32% | +9.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.15% | -6.17% | -1.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.24% | -14.29% | +5.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.99% | -16.75% | -7.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.98% | -1.43% | -4.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.24% | -4.04% | -1.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | 2.48% | +0.51% |
Volatility
QLVD vs. LVHD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD) is 2.92%, while Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) has a volatility of 4.05%. This indicates that QLVD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LVHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QLVD | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.92% | 4.05% | -1.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.56% | 7.26% | +1.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.59% | 9.98% | +0.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.75% | 12.91% | -1.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.95% | 15.53% | -1.58% |
QLVD vs. LVHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLVD has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHD's 0.27% expense ratio.
Dividends
QLVD vs. LVHD - Dividend Comparison
QLVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, less than LVHD's 3.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHD Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 3.29% | 3.35% | 4.23% | 3.55% | 3.30% | 2.56% | 3.27% | 3.30% | 3.82% | 3.33% | 2.48% |
QLVD FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 3.12% | 2.87% | 3.01% | 3.33% | 2.47% | 3.06% | 1.78% | 1.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QLVD and LVHD have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LVHD has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to QLVD (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLVD dropped -28.20% vs LVHD's -37.32%.
On 5-year performance, LVHD leads with 7.44% vs 5.87% for QLVD. On fees, LVHD is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, QLVD has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LVHD has performed better with a 7.44% return vs 5.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LVHD is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QLVD.
LVHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 3.12% for QLVD.
QLVD is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while LVHD is Dividend. QLVD tracks Northern Trust Developed Markets ex US Quality Low Volatility Index, while LVHD tracks Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for QLVD and 0.27% for LVHD.
LVHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QLVD and LVHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer