PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
QLVD vs. LGLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

QLVD vs. LGLV

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD) and SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV).

QLVD and LGLV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QLVD is a passively managed fund by Northern Trust that tracks the performance of the Northern Trust Developed Markets ex US Quality Low Volatility Index. It was launched on Jul 15, 2019. LGLV is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility (TR). It was launched on Feb 20, 2013. Both QLVD and LGLV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

QLVD vs. LGLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD) and SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QLVD vs. LGLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
QLVD
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund		3.29%24.21%4.67%11.57%-12.09%9.04%3.00%6.35%
LGLV
SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF		2.00%8.37%16.22%9.19%-8.17%27.95%7.42%4.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLVD achieves a 3.29% return, which is significantly higher than LGLV's 2.00% return.

QLVD

1D
2.09%
1M
-5.62%
YTD
3.29%
6M
6.74%
1Y
17.40%
3Y*
12.29%
5Y*
7.17%
10Y*
—

LGLV

1D
1.10%
1M
-5.28%
YTD
2.00%
6M
1.06%
1Y
4.45%
3Y*
11.46%
5Y*
9.25%
10Y*
11.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund

SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF

Often compared with QLVD:
QLVD vs. JEPIQLVD vs. DEEFQLVD vs. EFAVQLVD vs. SCHYQLVD vs. LVHIQLVD vs. IDLVQLVD vs. HDMV
Often compared with LGLV:
LGLV vs. SCHDLGLV vs. VOOLGLV vs. SMLVLGLV vs. SPTMLGLV vs. VSMVLGLV vs. SMLFLGLV vs. FNDX

QLVD vs. LGLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLVD has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than LGLV's 0.12% expense ratio.

QLVD
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
LGLV
SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF

Return for Risk

QLVD vs. LGLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
QLVD
QLVD Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
QLVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLVD Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QLVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLVD Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
LGLV
LGLV Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
LGLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGLV Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
LGLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGLV Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLVD vs. LGLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD) and SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

QLVDLGLVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.41

0.35

+1.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.00

0.58

+1.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.08

+0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

0.58

+1.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.00

2.44

+5.56

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QLVD vs. LGLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLVD Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is higher than the LGLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLVD and LGLV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

QLVDLGLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

0.35

+1.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.72

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.70

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.78

-0.28

Correlation

The correlation between QLVD and LGLV is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

QLVD vs. LGLV - Dividend Comparison

QLVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, more than LGLV's 2.02% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QLVD
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund		2.77%2.87%3.01%3.33%2.47%3.06%1.78%1.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LGLV
SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF		2.02%1.94%1.93%2.03%1.95%1.65%1.98%1.89%2.09%4.39%2.54%2.97%

Drawdowns

QLVD vs. LGLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLVD drawdown since its inception was -28.20%, smaller than the maximum LGLV drawdown of -36.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLVD and LGLV.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

QLVDLGLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.20%

-36.64%

+8.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.15%

-9.65%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.99%

-17.49%

-6.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-36.64%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.62%

-5.52%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.27%

-3.19%

-2.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

2.30%

-0.16%

Volatility

QLVD vs. LGLV - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD) has a higher volatility of 5.23% compared to SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) at 3.11%. This indicates that QLVD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LGLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

QLVDLGLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.23%

3.11%

+2.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.71%

6.63%

+1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.43%

12.78%

-0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.68%

12.93%

-1.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.02%

16.10%

-2.08%