QLD vs. ^TNX
QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%), while ^TNX (Cboe 10-Year Treasury Note Yield Index) is an index. Over the past 10 years, QLD returned 35.67%/yr vs 10.79%/yr for ^TNX. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
QLD vs. ^TNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLD achieves a 32.65% return, which is significantly higher than ^TNX's 7.78% return. Over the past 10 years, QLD has outperformed ^TNX with an annualized return of 35.67%, while ^TNX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.79% annualized return.
QLD
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- -0.55%
- YTD
- 32.65%
- 6M
- 32.82%
- 1Y
- 73.89%
- 3Y*
- 44.57%
- 5Y*
- 23.24%
- 10Y*
- 35.67%
^TNX
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- 7.78%
- 6M
- 6.99%
- 1Y
- 1.42%
- 3Y*
- 5.34%
- 5Y*
- 25.14%
- 10Y*
- 10.79%
QLD vs. ^TNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 32.65% | 30.36% | 42.82% | 117.72% | -60.52% | 54.67% | 88.90% | 81.69% | -8.31% | 70.34% |
^TNX Cboe 10-Year Treasury Note Yield Index | 7.78% | -8.97% | 18.29% | -0.34% | 156.55% | 64.89% | -52.21% | -28.56% | 11.68% | -1.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLD and ^TNX is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2006 | 0.21 |
The correlation between QLD and ^TNX shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QLD vs. ^TNX — Risk / Return Rank
QLD
^TNX
QLD vs. ^TNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and Cboe 10-Year Treasury Note Yield Index (^TNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QLD | ^TNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.04 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | 0.25 | +2.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.46 | 0.45 | +9.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QLD vs. ^TNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLD drawdown since its inception was -83.13%, smaller than the maximum ^TNX drawdown of -96.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLD and ^TNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLD | ^TNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.13% | -96.85% | +13.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.13% | -11.94% | -13.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.29% | -27.41% | -14.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.68% | -27.41% | -36.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.68% | -84.57% | +20.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.11% | -71.67% | +64.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.16% | -55.00% | +36.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.36% | 6.59% | +0.77% |
Volatility
QLD vs. ^TNX - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a higher volatility of 15.14% compared to Cboe 10-Year Treasury Note Yield Index (^TNX) at 5.04%. This indicates that QLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^TNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QLD | ^TNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.14% | 5.04% | +10.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.51% | 10.72% | +16.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.29% | 15.22% | +19.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.07% | 32.36% | +12.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.73% | 47.97% | -3.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QLD and ^TNX have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QLD has higher volatility (15.14%) compared to ^TNX (5.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLD dropped -83.13% vs ^TNX's -96.85%.
QLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QLD and ^TNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer