QINT vs. IQDF
QINT (American Century Quality Diversified International ETF) and IQDF (FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - QINT tracks the Alpha Vee American Century Diversified International Equity Index while IQDF tracks the Northern Trust International Quality Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QINT returned 8.81%/yr vs 10.43%/yr for IQDF. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QINT charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for IQDF.
Performance
QINT vs. IQDF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QINT achieves a 9.42% return, which is significantly lower than IQDF's 15.38% return.
QINT
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 3.10%
- YTD
- 9.42%
- 6M
- 12.42%
- 1Y
- 25.73%
- 3Y*
- 20.67%
- 5Y*
- 8.81%
- 10Y*
- —
IQDF
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 5.16%
- YTD
- 15.38%
- 6M
- 18.18%
- 1Y
- 35.90%
- 3Y*
- 22.80%
- 5Y*
- 10.43%
- 10Y*
- 9.66%
QINT vs. IQDF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QINT American Century Quality Diversified International ETF | 9.42% | 38.12% | 6.53% | 20.36% | -19.75% | 9.29% | 17.95% | 23.46% | -14.13% |
IQDF FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund | 15.38% | 35.42% | 6.62% | 20.10% | -14.69% | 10.18% | 3.54% | 20.96% | -8.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between QINT and IQDF is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2018 | 0.92 |
The correlation between QINT and IQDF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
QINT vs. IQDF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QINT
IQDF
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Technology
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
QINT
IQDF
Industrials
QINT
IQDF
Consumer Cyclical
QINT
IQDF
Healthcare
QINT
IQDF
Basic Materials
QINT
IQDF
Technology
QINT
IQDF
Energy
QINT
IQDF
Consumer Defensive
QINT
IQDF
Communication Services
QINT
IQDF
Utilities
QINT
IQDF
Real Estate
QINT
IQDF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QINT vs. IQDF — Risk / Return Rank
QINT
IQDF
QINT vs. IQDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) and FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund (IQDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QINT | IQDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.74 | 2.50 | -0.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.47 | 3.35 | -0.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.44 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 3.60 | -1.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.14 | 13.93 | -4.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QINT | IQDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 2.50 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.68 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.44 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
QINT vs. IQDF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QINT drawdown since its inception was -33.86%, smaller than the maximum IQDF drawdown of -39.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QINT and IQDF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QINT | IQDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.86% | -39.83% | +5.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.41% | -10.03% | -1.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.56% | -13.92% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.86% | -30.34% | -3.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.95% | -1.02% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.55% | -9.34% | +1.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 2.58% | +0.24% |
Volatility
QINT vs. IQDF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) is 4.84%, while FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund (IQDF) has a volatility of 5.63%. This indicates that QINT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QINT | IQDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.84% | 5.63% | -0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.35% | 12.23% | +0.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.84% | 14.44% | +0.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.22% | 15.49% | +0.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.06% | 16.63% | +1.43% |
QINT vs. IQDF - Expense Ratio Comparison
QINT has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than IQDF's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
QINT vs. IQDF - Dividend Comparison
QINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, less than IQDF's 2.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQDF FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund | 2.77% | 3.27% | 6.72% | 6.06% | 5.59% | 4.13% | 3.31% | 4.46% | 5.78% | 3.89% | 3.75% | 4.27% |
QINT American Century Quality Diversified International ETF | 2.50% | 2.66% | 3.49% | 3.12% | 3.56% | 2.30% | 1.61% | 1.83% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, QINT and IQDF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IQDF has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to QINT (4.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QINT dropped -33.86% vs IQDF's -39.83%.
On 5-year performance, IQDF leads with 10.43% vs 8.81% for QINT. On fees, QINT is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, QINT has been the lower-risk option at 4.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IQDF has performed better with a 10.43% return vs 8.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QINT is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IQDF.
IQDF has the higher dividend yield at 2.77%, compared with 2.50% for QINT.
QINT tracks Alpha Vee American Century Diversified International Equity Index, while IQDF tracks Northern Trust International Quality Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: American Century and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for QINT and 0.47% for IQDF.
IQDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QINT and IQDF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer