PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQDF vs. FDD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQDF vs. FDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund (IQDF) and First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQDF achieves a 14.42% return, which is significantly higher than FDD's 10.10% return. Over the past 10 years, IQDF has underperformed FDD with an annualized return of 10.13%, while FDD has yielded a comparatively higher 10.75% annualized return.


IQDF

1D
-2.67%
1M
0.78%
YTD
14.42%
6M
14.23%
1Y
34.45%
3Y*
22.56%
5Y*
10.57%
10Y*
10.13%

FDD

1D
-1.94%
1M
-2.36%
YTD
10.10%
6M
10.41%
1Y
30.12%
3Y*
26.20%
5Y*
11.36%
10Y*
10.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQDF vs. FDD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IQDF
FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund
14.42%35.42%6.62%20.10%-14.69%10.18%3.54%20.96%-17.39%23.87%
FDD
First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund
10.10%62.50%0.28%14.16%-16.14%16.03%-3.80%23.79%-8.98%19.07%

Correlation

The correlation between IQDF and FDD is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2013

0.84

The correlation between IQDF and FDD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

IQDF vs. FDD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IQDF
FDD

Financial Services

28.2%
52.0%

Technology

22.9%

-

Industrials

11.8%
13.3%

Basic Materials

7.4%
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

6.0%
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
3.6%

Healthcare

4.8%

-

Energy

4.2%
10.4%

Utilities

3.2%
6.0%

Communication Services

2.6%
2.1%

Real Estate

1.2%
3.3%

Financial Services

IQDF
28.2%
FDD
52.0%

Technology

IQDF
22.9%
FDD

-

Industrials

IQDF
11.8%
FDD
13.3%

Basic Materials

IQDF
7.4%
FDD
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

IQDF
6.0%
FDD
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

IQDF
4.9%
FDD
3.6%

Healthcare

IQDF
4.8%
FDD

-

Energy

IQDF
4.2%
FDD
10.4%

Utilities

IQDF
3.2%
FDD
6.0%

Communication Services

IQDF
2.6%
FDD
2.1%

Real Estate

IQDF
1.2%
FDD
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQDF vs. FDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQDF
IQDF Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
IQDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQDF Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
IQDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQDF Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

FDD
FDD Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDD Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDD Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQDF vs. FDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund (IQDF) and First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IQDFFDDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.32

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.45

3.22

+0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.16

10.63

+2.53

IQDF vs. FDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQDF Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the FDD Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQDF and FDD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IQDF vs. FDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQDF drawdown since its inception was -39.83%, smaller than the maximum FDD drawdown of -74.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQDF and FDD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQDFFDDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.83%

-74.77%

+34.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.03%

-9.39%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.92%

-13.06%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.36%

-34.84%

+5.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.83%

-41.43%

+1.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.67%

-3.52%

+0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.30%

-35.37%

+26.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

2.84%

-0.21%

Volatility

IQDF vs. FDD - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund (IQDF) has a higher volatility of 6.68% compared to First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD) at 5.51%. This indicates that IQDF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQDFFDDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.68%

5.51%

+1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.52%

13.16%

+0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.48%

16.09%

-0.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.70%

18.48%

-2.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.51%

19.86%

-3.35%

IQDF vs. FDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQDF has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than FDD's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQDF vs. FDD - Dividend Comparison

IQDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, less than FDD's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDD
First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund
3.59%3.99%7.65%6.85%6.07%3.44%4.01%4.69%5.05%2.78%4.88%4.35%
IQDF
FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund
3.05%3.27%6.72%6.06%5.59%4.13%3.31%4.46%5.78%3.89%3.75%4.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQDF and FDD have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IQDF has higher volatility (6.68%) compared to FDD (5.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQDF dropped -39.83% vs FDD's -74.77%.

On 10-year performance, FDD leads with 10.75% vs 10.13% for IQDF. On fees, IQDF is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, FDD has been the lower-risk option at 5.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FDD has performed better with a 10.75% return vs 10.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IQDF is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for FDD.

FDD has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 3.05% for IQDF.

IQDF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FDD is Europe Equities. IQDF tracks Northern Trust International Quality Dividend Index, while FDD tracks STOXX Europe Select Dividend 30. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IQDF and 0.58% for FDD.

IQDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQDF and FDD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer