PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQDF vs. FYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQDF vs. FYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund (IQDF) and Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQDF achieves a 14.35% return, which is significantly lower than FYLD's 16.42% return. Over the past 10 years, IQDF has underperformed FYLD with an annualized return of 9.32%, while FYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 11.33% annualized return.


IQDF

1D
-1.50%
1M
-1.51%
6M
10.22%
YTD
14.35%
1Y
29.69%
3Y*
20.90%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
9.32%

FYLD

1D
-0.07%
1M
-2.95%
6M
13.04%
YTD
16.42%
1Y
31.03%
3Y*
19.81%
5Y*
11.66%
10Y*
11.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQDF vs. FYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IQDF
FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund
14.35%35.42%6.62%20.10%-14.69%10.18%3.54%20.96%-17.39%23.87%
FYLD
Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF
16.42%34.53%3.00%13.18%-5.53%18.67%4.17%17.83%-14.47%29.81%

Correlation

The correlation between IQDF and FYLD is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2013

0.83

The correlation between IQDF and FYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IQDF vs. FYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IQDF
FYLD

Financial Services

27.1%
22.3%

Technology

20.1%
3.0%

Industrials

12.0%
13.7%

Basic Materials

7.5%
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

6.2%
11.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
7.9%

Healthcare

5.3%

-

Energy

4.3%
23.6%

Communication Services

3.6%
5.0%

Real Estate

3.0%

-

Utilities

2.9%
4.0%

Financial Services

IQDF
27.1%
FYLD
22.3%

Technology

IQDF
20.1%
FYLD
3.0%

Industrials

IQDF
12.0%
FYLD
13.7%

Basic Materials

IQDF
7.5%
FYLD
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IQDF
6.2%
FYLD
11.8%

Consumer Defensive

IQDF
5.5%
FYLD
7.9%

Healthcare

IQDF
5.3%
FYLD

-

Energy

IQDF
4.3%
FYLD
23.6%

Communication Services

IQDF
3.6%
FYLD
5.0%

Real Estate

IQDF
3.0%
FYLD

-

Utilities

IQDF
2.9%
FYLD
4.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQDF vs. FYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQDF
IQDF Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
IQDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQDF Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
IQDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQDF Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FYLD
FYLD Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQDF vs. FYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund (IQDF) and Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IQDFFYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.45

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

5.50

-2.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.12

16.49

-5.37

IQDF vs. FYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQDF Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the FYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQDF and FYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IQDF vs. FYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQDF drawdown since its inception was -39.83%, smaller than the maximum FYLD drawdown of -44.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQDF and FYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQDFFYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.83%

-44.55%

+4.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.03%

-5.67%

-4.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.92%

-15.15%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.31%

-25.12%

-4.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.83%

-44.55%

+4.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.73%

-3.27%

+0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.28%

-8.78%

-0.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

1.89%

+0.79%

Volatility

IQDF vs. FYLD - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund (IQDF) has a higher volatility of 6.01% compared to Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) at 4.15%. This indicates that IQDF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQDFFYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.01%

4.15%

+1.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.85%

9.60%

+4.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.73%

12.12%

+3.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.74%

16.24%

-0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.47%

17.74%

-1.27%

IQDF vs. FYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQDF has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than FYLD's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQDF vs. FYLD - Dividend Comparison

IQDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, less than FYLD's 3.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FYLD
Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF
3.46%4.07%5.41%6.06%6.13%4.74%3.94%3.73%5.17%2.85%2.72%3.98%
IQDF
FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund
3.05%3.27%6.72%6.06%5.59%4.13%3.31%4.46%5.78%3.89%3.75%4.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQDF and FYLD have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IQDF has higher volatility (6.01%) compared to FYLD (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQDF dropped -39.83% vs FYLD's -44.55%.

On 10-year performance, FYLD leads with 11.33% vs 9.32% for IQDF. On fees, IQDF is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, FYLD has been the lower-risk option at 4.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FYLD has performed better with a 11.33% return vs 9.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IQDF is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FYLD.

FYLD has the higher dividend yield at 3.46%, compared with 3.05% for IQDF.

IQDF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FYLD is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IQDF and 0.59% for FYLD.

FYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQDF and FYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer