QINT vs. INTF

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

QINT (American Century Quality Diversified International ETF) and INTF (iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - QINT tracks the Alpha Vee American Century Diversified International Equity Index while INTF tracks the MSCI World ex USA Diversified Multi-Factor. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QINT returned 9.17%/yr vs 9.90%/yr for INTF. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. QINT charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for INTF.

Performance

QINT vs. INTF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) and iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF (INTF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QINT having a 10.27% return and INTF slightly higher at 10.41%.

QINT

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 2.51%
• YTD: 10.27%
• 6M: 13.81%
• 1Y: 25.71%
• 3Y*: 20.98%
• 5Y*: 9.17%
• 10Y*: —

INTF

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 1.96%
• YTD: 10.41%
• 6M: 14.13%
• 1Y: 25.27%
• 3Y*: 19.86%
• 5Y*: 9.90%
• 10Y*: 9.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QINT vs. INTF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
QINT American Century Quality Diversified International ETF	10.27%	38.12%	6.53%	20.36%	-19.75%	9.29%	17.95%	23.46%	-14.13%
INTF iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF	10.41%	35.50%	5.99%	18.25%	-12.31%	11.70%	2.83%	18.46%	-12.18%

Correlation

The correlation between QINT and INTF is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2018	0.96

The correlation between QINT and INTF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

QINT vs. INTF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QINT	INTF
Financial Services	19.8%	25.2%
Industrials	19.0%	19.1%
Consumer Cyclical	13.6%	9.0%
Healthcare	10.2%	8.2%
Basic Materials	9.4%	6.6%
Technology	8.9%	8.5%
Energy	6.4%	5.9%
Consumer Defensive	5.8%	6.3%
Communication Services	4.4%	3.9%
Utilities	1.6%	4.7%
Real Estate	1.0%	2.7%

Return for Risk

QINT vs. INTF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QINT

QINT Risk / Return Rank: 50
QINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
QINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
QINT Omega Ratio Rank: 50
QINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
QINT Martin Ratio Rank: 55

INTF

INTF Risk / Return Rank: 52
INTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
INTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
INTF Omega Ratio Rank: 49
INTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
INTF Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QINT vs. INTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) and iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF (INTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QINT	INTF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	1.75	0.00
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.47	2.44	+0.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.31	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.37	2.63	-0.26
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.60	10.44	-0.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QINT vs. INTF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QINT Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the INTF Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QINT and INTF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QINT	INTF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.74	1.75	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57	0.62	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.54	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.45	+0.13

Drawdowns

QINT vs. INTF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QINT drawdown since its inception was -33.86%, smaller than the maximum INTF drawdown of -40.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QINT and INTF.

Drawdown Indicators

	QINT	INTF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.86%	-40.39%	+6.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.41%	-10.20%	-1.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.56%	-13.64%	+0.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.86%	-29.26%	-4.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.39%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.18%	-0.19%	+0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.55%	-7.70%	+0.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.82%	2.57%	+0.25%

Volatility

QINT vs. INTF - Volatility Comparison

American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) has a higher volatility of 4.99% compared to iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF (INTF) at 4.65%. This indicates that QINT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QINT	INTF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.99%	4.65%	+0.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.33%	11.96%	+0.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.85%	14.57%	+0.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.22%	16.16%	+0.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.06%	17.35%	+0.71%

QINT vs. INTF - Expense Ratio Comparison

QINT has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than INTF's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

QINT vs. INTF - Dividend Comparison

QINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, less than INTF's 2.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
INTF iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF	2.60%	2.87%	3.53%	3.59%	2.81%	5.38%	2.06%	3.65%	2.62%	3.26%	1.66%	0.85%
QINT American Century Quality Diversified International ETF	2.48%	2.66%	3.49%	3.12%	3.56%	2.30%	1.61%	1.83%	0.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QINT and INTF in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, QINT and INTF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, QINT or INTF?

QINT has higher volatility (4.99%) compared to INTF (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QINT dropped -33.86% vs INTF's -40.39%.

Which ETF is better, QINT or INTF?

On 5-year performance, INTF leads with 9.90% vs 9.17% for QINT. On fees, INTF is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, INTF has been the lower-risk option at 4.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QINT or INTF?

Over the 5-year period, INTF has performed better with a 9.90% return vs 9.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QINT or INTF?

INTF is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for QINT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QINT or INTF?

INTF has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 2.48% for QINT.

What is the main difference between QINT and INTF?

QINT tracks Alpha Vee American Century Diversified International Equity Index, while INTF tracks MSCI World ex USA Diversified Multi-Factor. They also come from different issuers: American Century and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for QINT and 0.30% for INTF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.