PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
INTF vs. LRGF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between INTF and LRGF is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

INTF vs. LRGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF (INTF) and iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-1.34%
10.44%
INTF
LRGF

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

INTF:

0.65

LRGF:

2.26

Sortino Ratio

INTF:

0.96

LRGF:

3.03

Omega Ratio

INTF:

1.12

LRGF:

1.42

Calmar Ratio

INTF:

0.95

LRGF:

3.43

Martin Ratio

INTF:

2.59

LRGF:

14.72

Ulcer Index

INTF:

3.25%

LRGF:

2.00%

Daily Std Dev

INTF:

12.99%

LRGF:

13.04%

Max Drawdown

INTF:

-40.39%

LRGF:

-36.03%

Current Drawdown

INTF:

-8.86%

LRGF:

-3.46%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INTF achieves a 5.40% return, which is significantly lower than LRGF's 27.68% return.


INTF

YTD

5.40%

1M

-1.11%

6M

-0.33%

1Y

6.77%

5Y*

4.76%

10Y*

N/A

LRGF

YTD

27.68%

1M

0.01%

6M

10.10%

1Y

28.16%

5Y*

13.76%

10Y*

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


INTF vs. LRGF - Expense Ratio Comparison

INTF has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than LRGF's 0.20% expense ratio.


INTF
iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF
Expense ratio chart for INTF: current value at 0.30% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.30%
Expense ratio chart for LRGF: current value at 0.20% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.20%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

INTF vs. LRGF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF (INTF) and iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for INTF, currently valued at 0.65, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.652.26
The chart of Sortino ratio for INTF, currently valued at 0.96, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.000.963.03
The chart of Omega ratio for INTF, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.121.42
The chart of Calmar ratio for INTF, currently valued at 0.95, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.953.43
The chart of Martin ratio for INTF, currently valued at 2.59, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.002.5914.72
INTF
LRGF

The current INTF Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the LRGF Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INTF and LRGF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
0.65
2.26
INTF
LRGF

Dividends

INTF vs. LRGF - Dividend Comparison

INTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than LRGF's 1.22% yield.


TTM202320222021202020192018201720162015
INTF
iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF
3.55%3.59%2.81%5.38%2.06%3.65%2.62%3.25%1.66%0.85%
LRGF
iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF
1.22%1.50%1.78%1.06%1.35%1.76%3.27%1.68%1.56%0.84%

Drawdowns

INTF vs. LRGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INTF drawdown since its inception was -40.39%, which is greater than LRGF's maximum drawdown of -36.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTF and LRGF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-8.86%
-3.46%
INTF
LRGF

Volatility

INTF vs. LRGF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF (INTF) is 3.52%, while iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) has a volatility of 4.13%. This indicates that INTF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LRGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
3.52%
4.13%
INTF
LRGF
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab