INTF vs. SPY
INTF (iShares International Equity Factor ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INTF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the STOXX International Equity Factor Index (USD) (Net), while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, INTF returned 9.68%/yr vs 15.09%/yr for SPY. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. INTF charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
INTF vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INTF achieves a 13.53% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 11.70% return. Over the past 10 years, INTF has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 9.68%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.09% annualized return.
INTF
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 2.13%
- 6M
- 7.09%
- YTD
- 13.53%
- 1Y
- 28.76%
- 3Y*
- 19.98%
- 5Y*
- 10.56%
- 10Y*
- 9.68%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.98%
SPY
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 1.73%
- 6M
- 9.53%
- YTD
- 11.70%
- 1Y
- 23.22%
- 3Y*
- 20.74%
- 5Y*
- 13.05%
- 10Y*
- 15.09%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.83%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $7.17M | $9.22M | $11.65M | |
| $38.19B | $36.17B | $39.59B |
INTF vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INTF iShares International Equity Factor ETF | 13.53% | 35.50% | 5.99% | 18.25% | -12.31% | 11.70% | 2.83% | 18.46% | -15.87% | 28.46% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 11.70% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between INTF and SPY is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2015 | 0.74 |
The correlation between INTF and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
INTF vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INTF
SPY
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
INTF
SPY
Industrials
INTF
SPY
Technology
INTF
SPY
Healthcare
INTF
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
INTF
SPY
Basic Materials
INTF
SPY
Energy
INTF
SPY
Consumer Defensive
INTF
SPY
Utilities
INTF
SPY
Communication Services
INTF
SPY
Real Estate
INTF
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INTF vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
INTF
SPY
INTF vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Equity Factor ETF (INTF) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INTF | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.32 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.83 | 2.62 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.36 | 11.20 | +0.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INTF vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INTF drawdown since its inception was -40.39%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTF and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INTF | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.39% | -55.19% | +14.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.20% | -8.88% | -1.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.64% | -18.76% | +5.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.26% | -24.50% | -4.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.39% | -33.72% | -6.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | 0.00% | -0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.60% | -9.01% | +1.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.54% | 2.08% | +0.46% |
Volatility
INTF vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
iShares International Equity Factor ETF (INTF) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 3.84%. This indicates that INTF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INTF | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.20% | 3.84% | +0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.82% | 10.23% | +2.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.06% | 12.87% | +2.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.22% | 17.19% | -0.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.02% | 17.96% | -0.94% |
INTF vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
INTF has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
INTF vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
INTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, more than SPY's 0.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INTF iShares International Equity Factor ETF | 2.95% | 2.87% | 3.53% | 3.59% | 2.81% | 5.38% | 2.06% | 3.65% | 2.62% | 3.26% | 1.66% | 0.85% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 0.99% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INTF and SPY have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INTF has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to SPY (3.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INTF dropped -40.39% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.09% vs 9.68% for INTF. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 3.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.09% return vs 9.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for INTF.
INTF has the higher dividend yield at 2.95%, compared with 0.99% for SPY.
INTF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. INTF tracks STOXX International Equity Factor Index (USD) (Net), while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for INTF and 0.09% for SPY.
INTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INTF and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer