PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QINT vs. AVLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QINT vs. AVLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QINT achieves a 9.42% return, which is significantly lower than AVLV's 20.64% return.


QINT

1D
-0.76%
1M
3.10%
YTD
9.42%
6M
12.42%
1Y
25.73%
3Y*
20.67%
5Y*
8.81%
10Y*

AVLV

1D
0.14%
1M
5.75%
YTD
20.64%
6M
22.01%
1Y
38.77%
3Y*
23.23%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QINT vs. AVLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QINT
American Century Quality Diversified International ETF
9.42%38.12%6.53%20.36%-19.75%-1.95%
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
20.64%15.12%17.49%17.43%-5.53%5.92%

Correlation

The correlation between QINT and AVLV is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2021

0.76

The correlation between QINT and AVLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

QINT vs. AVLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QINT
AVLV

Financial Services

19.8%
16.3%

Industrials

19.0%
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

13.6%
14.1%

Healthcare

10.2%
5.6%

Basic Materials

9.4%
2.0%

Technology

8.9%
17.2%

Energy

6.4%
14.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.8%
7.7%

Communication Services

4.4%
6.9%

Utilities

1.6%
0.3%

Real Estate

1.0%
0.1%

Financial Services

QINT
19.8%
AVLV
16.3%

Industrials

QINT
19.0%
AVLV
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

QINT
13.6%
AVLV
14.1%

Healthcare

QINT
10.2%
AVLV
5.6%

Basic Materials

QINT
9.4%
AVLV
2.0%

Technology

QINT
8.9%
AVLV
17.2%

Energy

QINT
6.4%
AVLV
14.4%

Consumer Defensive

QINT
5.8%
AVLV
7.7%

Communication Services

QINT
4.4%
AVLV
6.9%

Utilities

QINT
1.6%
AVLV
0.3%

Real Estate

QINT
1.0%
AVLV
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QINT vs. AVLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QINT
QINT Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
QINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
QINT Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
QINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
QINT Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

AVLV
AVLV Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
AVLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVLV Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AVLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVLV Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QINT vs. AVLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QINTAVLVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.74

3.18

-1.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.47

4.39

-1.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.57

-0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

6.09

-3.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.14

24.39

-15.24

QINT vs. AVLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QINT Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is lower than the AVLV Sharpe Ratio of 3.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QINT and AVLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QINTAVLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

3.18

-1.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.86

-0.29

Drawdowns

QINT vs. AVLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QINT drawdown since its inception was -33.86%, which is greater than AVLV's maximum drawdown of -19.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QINT and AVLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QINTAVLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.86%

-19.50%

-14.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.41%

-6.39%

-5.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.56%

-19.50%

+5.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

0.00%

-0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.55%

-3.93%

-3.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

1.59%

+1.23%

Volatility

QINT vs. AVLV - Volatility Comparison

American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) at 3.12%. This indicates that QINT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QINTAVLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.84%

3.12%

+1.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.35%

9.04%

+3.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.84%

12.29%

+2.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.22%

17.35%

-1.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.06%

17.35%

+0.71%

QINT vs. AVLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

QINT has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than AVLV's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

QINT vs. AVLV - Dividend Comparison

QINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, more than AVLV's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
1.07%1.33%1.58%1.85%2.00%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QINT
American Century Quality Diversified International ETF
2.50%2.66%3.49%3.12%3.56%2.30%1.61%1.83%0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


QINT and AVLV have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QINT has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to AVLV (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QINT dropped -33.86% vs AVLV's -19.50%.

On 3-year performance, AVLV leads with 23.23% vs 20.67% for QINT. On fees, AVLV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AVLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AVLV has performed better with a 23.23% return vs 20.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVLV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for QINT.

QINT has the higher dividend yield at 2.50%, compared with 1.07% for AVLV.

QINT is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while AVLV is Large Cap Value Equities. QINT tracks Alpha Vee American Century Diversified International Equity Index, while AVLV tracks Russell 1000 Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for QINT and 0.15% for AVLV.

AVLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QINT and AVLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer