AVLV vs. VLUE

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AVLV (Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF) and VLUE (iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. AVLV is actively managed, while VLUE is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AVLV returned 22.67%/yr vs 32.50%/yr for VLUE. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.

Performance

AVLV vs. VLUE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) and iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVLV achieves a 20.57% return, which is significantly lower than VLUE's 45.30% return.

AVLV

• 1D: -1.02%
• 1M: 1.99%
• YTD: 20.57%
• 6M: 19.54%
• 1Y: 37.53%
• 3Y*: 22.67%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VLUE

• 1D: -3.46%
• 1M: 5.59%
• YTD: 45.30%
• 6M: 44.72%
• 1Y: 81.73%
• 3Y*: 32.50%
• 5Y*: 16.52%
• 10Y*: 15.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVLV vs. VLUE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AVLV Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF	20.57%	15.12%	17.49%	17.43%	-5.53%	6.27%
VLUE iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF	45.30%	32.67%	7.25%	14.26%	-14.17%	9.29%

Correlation

The correlation between AVLV and VLUE is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2021	0.92

The correlation between AVLV and VLUE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVLV vs. VLUE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AVLV	VLUE
Technology	17.2%	40.7%
Financial Services	16.3%	10.5%
Industrials	15.4%	8.0%
Energy	14.4%	3.5%
Consumer Cyclical	14.1%	10.1%
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	4.4%
Communication Services	6.9%	9.5%
Healthcare	5.6%	7.9%
Basic Materials	2.0%	1.3%
Utilities	0.3%	2.0%
Real Estate	0.1%	1.8%

Return for Risk

AVLV vs. VLUE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVLV

AVLV Risk / Return Rank: 91
AVLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
AVLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
AVLV Omega Ratio Rank: 89
AVLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
AVLV Martin Ratio Rank: 93

VLUE

VLUE Risk / Return Rank: 96
VLUE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
VLUE Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
VLUE Omega Ratio Rank: 95
VLUE Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
VLUE Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVLV vs. VLUE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) and iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AVLV	VLUE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.99	4.31	-1.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.11	5.37	-1.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.73	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.90	9.09	-3.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	23.36	38.03	-14.67

AVLV vs. VLUE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVLV Sharpe Ratio is 2.99, which is lower than the VLUE Sharpe Ratio of 4.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVLV and VLUE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AVLV vs. VLUE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVLV drawdown since its inception was -19.50%, smaller than the maximum VLUE drawdown of -39.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVLV and VLUE.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVLV	VLUE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.50%	-39.47%	+19.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.39%	-9.04%	+2.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.50%	-17.89%	-1.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.12%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.47%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.30%	-3.46%	+2.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.89%	-6.00%	+2.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.61%	2.16%	-0.55%

Volatility

AVLV vs. VLUE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) is 3.99%, while iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) has a volatility of 9.76%. This indicates that AVLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VLUE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVLV	VLUE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.99%	9.76%	-5.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.41%	16.13%	-6.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.60%	19.07%	-6.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.33%	18.12%	-0.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.33%	19.95%	-2.62%

AVLV vs. VLUE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AVLV and VLUE have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

AVLV vs. VLUE - Dividend Comparison

AVLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than VLUE's 1.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AVLV Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF	1.38%	1.33%	1.58%	1.85%	2.00%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VLUE iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF	1.42%	2.11%	2.73%	2.66%	3.18%	2.22%	2.42%	2.61%	2.70%	2.14%	2.07%	2.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVLV and VLUE in my portfolio?

AVLV and VLUE have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AVLV or VLUE?

VLUE has higher volatility (9.76%) compared to AVLV (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVLV dropped -19.50% vs VLUE's -39.47%.

Which ETF is better, AVLV or VLUE?

On 3-year performance, VLUE leads with 32.50% vs 22.67% for AVLV. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, AVLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AVLV or VLUE?

Over the 3-year period, VLUE has performed better with a 32.50% return vs 22.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVLV or VLUE?

AVLV and VLUE have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVLV or VLUE?

VLUE has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 1.38% for AVLV.

What is the main difference between AVLV and VLUE?

They also come from different issuers: Avantis and iShares.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VLUE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.31 vs 2.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.