QINT vs. AVES
QINT (American Century Quality Diversified International ETF) and AVES (Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QINT is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Alpha Vee American Century Diversified International Equity Index, while AVES is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by American Century. QINT is passively managed, while AVES is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, QINT returned 20.67%/yr vs 20.73%/yr for AVES. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QINT charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for AVES.
Performance
QINT vs. AVES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QINT achieves a 9.42% return, which is significantly lower than AVES's 16.79% return.
QINT
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 3.10%
- YTD
- 9.42%
- 6M
- 12.42%
- 1Y
- 25.73%
- 3Y*
- 20.67%
- 5Y*
- 8.81%
- 10Y*
- —
AVES
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 4.98%
- YTD
- 16.79%
- 6M
- 19.15%
- 1Y
- 37.50%
- 3Y*
- 20.73%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QINT vs. AVES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QINT American Century Quality Diversified International ETF | 9.42% | 38.12% | 6.53% | 20.36% | -19.75% | 3.84% |
AVES Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF | 16.79% | 30.49% | 4.50% | 16.79% | -16.04% | 1.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between QINT and AVES is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021 | 0.78 |
The correlation between QINT and AVES has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
QINT vs. AVES - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QINT
AVES
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Technology
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
QINT
AVES
Industrials
QINT
AVES
Consumer Cyclical
QINT
AVES
Healthcare
QINT
AVES
Basic Materials
QINT
AVES
Technology
QINT
AVES
Energy
QINT
AVES
Consumer Defensive
QINT
AVES
Communication Services
QINT
AVES
Utilities
QINT
AVES
Real Estate
QINT
AVES
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QINT vs. AVES — Risk / Return Rank
QINT
AVES
QINT vs. AVES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) and Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QINT | AVES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.40 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 2.92 | -0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.14 | 10.84 | -1.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QINT | AVES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 2.19 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.61 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
QINT vs. AVES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QINT drawdown since its inception was -33.86%, which is greater than AVES's maximum drawdown of -27.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QINT and AVES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QINT | AVES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.86% | -27.40% | -6.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.41% | -12.90% | +1.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.56% | -18.50% | +4.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.95% | -1.36% | +0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.55% | -7.73% | +0.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 3.47% | -0.65% |
Volatility
QINT vs. AVES - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) is 4.84%, while Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES) has a volatility of 6.93%. This indicates that QINT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QINT | AVES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.84% | 6.93% | -2.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.35% | 14.44% | -2.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.84% | 17.19% | -2.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.22% | 16.98% | -0.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.06% | 16.98% | +1.08% |
QINT vs. AVES - Expense Ratio Comparison
QINT has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than AVES's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
QINT vs. AVES - Dividend Comparison
QINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, less than AVES's 2.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVES Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF | 2.81% | 3.17% | 4.09% | 3.96% | 3.70% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QINT American Century Quality Diversified International ETF | 2.50% | 2.66% | 3.49% | 3.12% | 3.56% | 2.30% | 1.61% | 1.83% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QINT and AVES have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVES has higher volatility (6.93%) compared to QINT (4.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QINT dropped -33.86% vs AVES's -27.40%.
On 3-year performance, AVES leads with 20.73% vs 20.67% for QINT. On fees, AVES is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, QINT has been the lower-risk option at 4.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, AVES has performed better with a 20.73% return vs 20.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVES is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for QINT.
AVES has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 2.50% for QINT.
QINT is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while AVES is Emerging Markets Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for QINT and 0.36% for AVES.
AVES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QINT and AVES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer