PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QINT vs. AVES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QINT vs. AVES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) and Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QINT achieves a 9.42% return, which is significantly lower than AVES's 16.79% return.


QINT

1D
-0.76%
1M
3.10%
YTD
9.42%
6M
12.42%
1Y
25.73%
3Y*
20.67%
5Y*
8.81%
10Y*

AVES

1D
-1.23%
1M
4.98%
YTD
16.79%
6M
19.15%
1Y
37.50%
3Y*
20.73%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QINT vs. AVES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QINT
American Century Quality Diversified International ETF
9.42%38.12%6.53%20.36%-19.75%3.84%
AVES
Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF
16.79%30.49%4.50%16.79%-16.04%1.32%

Correlation

The correlation between QINT and AVES is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021

0.78

The correlation between QINT and AVES has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

QINT vs. AVES - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QINT
AVES

Financial Services

19.8%
25.3%

Industrials

19.0%
13.3%

Consumer Cyclical

13.6%
9.6%

Healthcare

10.2%
2.1%

Basic Materials

9.4%
9.8%

Technology

8.9%
21.4%

Energy

6.4%
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.8%
3.2%

Communication Services

4.4%
5.3%

Utilities

1.6%
1.7%

Real Estate

1.0%
2.4%

Financial Services

QINT
19.8%
AVES
25.3%

Industrials

QINT
19.0%
AVES
13.3%

Consumer Cyclical

QINT
13.6%
AVES
9.6%

Healthcare

QINT
10.2%
AVES
2.1%

Basic Materials

QINT
9.4%
AVES
9.8%

Technology

QINT
8.9%
AVES
21.4%

Energy

QINT
6.4%
AVES
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

QINT
5.8%
AVES
3.2%

Communication Services

QINT
4.4%
AVES
5.3%

Utilities

QINT
1.6%
AVES
1.7%

Real Estate

QINT
1.0%
AVES
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QINT vs. AVES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QINT
QINT Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
QINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
QINT Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
QINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
QINT Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

AVES
AVES Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
AVES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVES Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVES Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
AVES Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVES Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QINT vs. AVES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) and Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QINTAVESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.40

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

2.92

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.14

10.84

-1.70

QINT vs. AVES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QINT Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the AVES Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QINT and AVES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QINTAVESDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

2.19

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.61

-0.04

Drawdowns

QINT vs. AVES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QINT drawdown since its inception was -33.86%, which is greater than AVES's maximum drawdown of -27.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QINT and AVES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QINTAVESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.86%

-27.40%

-6.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.41%

-12.90%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.56%

-18.50%

+4.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-1.36%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.55%

-7.73%

+0.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

3.47%

-0.65%

Volatility

QINT vs. AVES - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) is 4.84%, while Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES) has a volatility of 6.93%. This indicates that QINT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QINTAVESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.84%

6.93%

-2.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.35%

14.44%

-2.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.84%

17.19%

-2.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.22%

16.98%

-0.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.06%

16.98%

+1.08%

QINT vs. AVES - Expense Ratio Comparison

QINT has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than AVES's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

QINT vs. AVES - Dividend Comparison

QINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, less than AVES's 2.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AVES
Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF
2.81%3.17%4.09%3.96%3.70%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QINT
American Century Quality Diversified International ETF
2.50%2.66%3.49%3.12%3.56%2.30%1.61%1.83%0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


QINT and AVES have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVES has higher volatility (6.93%) compared to QINT (4.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QINT dropped -33.86% vs AVES's -27.40%.

On 3-year performance, AVES leads with 20.73% vs 20.67% for QINT. On fees, AVES is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, QINT has been the lower-risk option at 4.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AVES has performed better with a 20.73% return vs 20.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVES is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for QINT.

AVES has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 2.50% for QINT.

QINT is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while AVES is Emerging Markets Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for QINT and 0.36% for AVES.

AVES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QINT and AVES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer