PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVES vs. AVEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVES vs. AVEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES) and Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVES achieves a 16.79% return, which is significantly lower than AVEM's 27.59% return.


AVES

1D
-1.23%
1M
4.98%
YTD
16.79%
6M
19.15%
1Y
37.50%
3Y*
20.73%
5Y*
10Y*

AVEM

1D
-1.39%
1M
8.65%
YTD
27.59%
6M
29.75%
1Y
55.00%
3Y*
26.07%
5Y*
9.92%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVES vs. AVEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AVES
Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF
16.79%30.49%4.50%16.79%-16.04%1.32%
AVEM
Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF
27.59%34.48%7.49%15.30%-18.15%0.05%

Correlation

The correlation between AVES and AVEM is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021

0.96

The correlation between AVES and AVEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVES vs. AVEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AVES
AVEM

Financial Services

25.3%
20.7%

Technology

21.4%
32.3%

Industrials

13.3%
9.2%

Basic Materials

9.8%
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
9.2%

Communication Services

5.3%
5.4%

Energy

4.0%
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
3.1%

Real Estate

2.4%
1.6%

Healthcare

2.1%
2.8%

Utilities

1.7%
2.6%

Financial Services

AVES
25.3%
AVEM
20.7%

Technology

AVES
21.4%
AVEM
32.3%

Industrials

AVES
13.3%
AVEM
9.2%

Basic Materials

AVES
9.8%
AVEM
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

AVES
9.6%
AVEM
9.2%

Communication Services

AVES
5.3%
AVEM
5.4%

Energy

AVES
4.0%
AVEM
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

AVES
3.2%
AVEM
3.1%

Real Estate

AVES
2.4%
AVEM
1.6%

Healthcare

AVES
2.1%
AVEM
2.8%

Utilities

AVES
1.7%
AVEM
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVES vs. AVEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVES
AVES Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
AVES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVES Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVES Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
AVES Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVES Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

AVEM
AVEM Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
AVEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
AVEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVES vs. AVEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES) and Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AVESAVEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.51

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

4.21

-1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.84

16.70

-5.85

AVES vs. AVEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVES Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the AVEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVES and AVEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVESAVEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

2.84

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.66

-0.04

Drawdowns

AVES vs. AVEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVES drawdown since its inception was -27.40%, smaller than the maximum AVEM drawdown of -36.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVES and AVEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVESAVEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.40%

-36.05%

+8.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.90%

-13.13%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.50%

-18.02%

-0.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

-1.39%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.73%

-10.09%

+2.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.47%

3.30%

+0.17%

Volatility

AVES vs. AVEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES) is 6.93%, while Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM) has a volatility of 8.33%. This indicates that AVES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVESAVEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.93%

8.33%

-1.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.44%

16.72%

-2.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.19%

19.45%

-2.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.98%

18.34%

-1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.98%

20.55%

-3.57%

AVES vs. AVEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVES has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than AVEM's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVES vs. AVEM - Dividend Comparison

AVES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, more than AVEM's 1.98% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AVEM
Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF
1.98%2.45%3.17%3.06%2.77%2.61%1.60%0.35%
AVES
Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF
2.81%3.17%4.09%3.96%3.70%0.62%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, AVES and AVEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AVEM has higher volatility (8.33%) compared to AVES (6.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVES dropped -27.40% vs AVEM's -36.05%.

On 3-year performance, AVEM leads with 26.07% vs 20.73% for AVES. On fees, AVEM is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, AVES has been the lower-risk option at 6.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AVEM has performed better with a 26.07% return vs 20.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVEM is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for AVES.

AVES has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 1.98% for AVEM.

Their fees differ too: 0.36% for AVES and 0.33% for AVEM.

AVEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVES and AVEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer