AVES vs. DFEV

Last updated Jul 31, 2026

AVES (Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF) and DFEV (Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, AVES returned 14.60%/yr vs 19.00%/yr for DFEV. Their 0.95 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. AVES charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for DFEV.

Performance

AVES vs. DFEV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES) and Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVES achieves a 8.40% return, which is significantly lower than DFEV's 18.35% return.

AVES

• 1D: 3.26%
• 1M: -4.41%
• 6M: -0.89%
• YTD: 8.40%
• 1Y: 18.52%
• 3Y*: 14.60%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.20%

DFEV

• 1D: 3.68%
• 1M: -7.00%
• 6M: 7.35%
• YTD: 18.35%
• 1Y: 33.70%
• 3Y*: 19.00%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AVES Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF	$7.66M	$7.22M	$6.15M
DFEV Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF	$13.30M	$11.97M	$9.92M

AVES vs. DFEV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
AVES Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF	8.40%	30.49%	4.50%	16.79%	-6.73%
DFEV Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF	18.35%	32.54%	7.26%	15.52%	-6.08%

Correlation

The correlation between AVES and DFEV is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2022	0.95

The correlation between AVES and DFEV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AVES vs. DFEV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AVES

AVES Risk / Return Rank: 41
AVES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
AVES Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
AVES Omega Ratio Rank: 41
AVES Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
AVES Martin Ratio Rank: 43

DFEV

DFEV Risk / Return Rank: 71
DFEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
DFEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
DFEV Omega Ratio Rank: 74
DFEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
DFEV Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AVES vs. DFEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES) and Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AVES	DFEV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.93	1.58	-0.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.36	2.13	-0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.30	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.44	2.44	-1.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.40	8.27	-3.87

AVES vs. DFEV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVES Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the DFEV Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVES and DFEV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AVES vs. DFEV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVES drawdown since its inception was -27.40%, which is greater than DFEV's maximum drawdown of -18.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVES and DFEV.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVES	DFEV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.40%	-18.49%	-8.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.90%	-13.86%	+0.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.50%	-17.94%	-0.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.80%	-10.68%	+1.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.66%	-4.71%	-2.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.22%	4.09%	+0.13%

Volatility

AVES vs. DFEV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES) is 7.16%, while Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV) has a volatility of 8.46%. This indicates that AVES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVES	DFEV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.16%	8.46%	-1.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.99%	19.68%	-1.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.02%	21.41%	-1.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.49%	17.37%	+0.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.49%	17.37%	+0.12%

AVES vs. DFEV - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVES has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than DFEV's 0.43% expense ratio.

Dividends

AVES vs. DFEV - Dividend Comparison

AVES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, more than DFEV's 2.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AVES Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF	2.57%	3.17%	4.09%	3.96%	3.70%	0.62%
DFEV Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF	2.17%	2.69%	3.17%	3.47%	3.35%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVES and DFEV in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, AVES and DFEV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, AVES or DFEV?

DFEV has higher volatility (8.46%) compared to AVES (7.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVES dropped -27.40% vs DFEV's -18.49%.

Which ETF is better, AVES or DFEV?

On 3-year performance, DFEV leads with 19.00% vs 14.60% for AVES. On fees, AVES is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, AVES has been the lower-risk option at 7.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AVES or DFEV?

Over the 3-year period, DFEV has performed better with a 19.00% return vs 14.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVES or DFEV?

AVES is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for DFEV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVES or DFEV?

AVES has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 2.17% for DFEV.

What is the main difference between AVES and DFEV?

They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for AVES and 0.43% for DFEV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.