PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QFRD vs. MEME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QFRD vs. MEME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF (QFRD) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


QFRD

1D
-3.92%
1M
6.13%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MEME

1D
-12.84%
1M
1.23%
YTD
58.71%
6M
39.97%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QFRD vs. MEME - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QFRD and MEME is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2026

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QFRD vs. MEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF (QFRD) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QFRD vs. MEME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QFRDMEMEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.50

0.01

+1.49

Drawdowns

QFRD vs. MEME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QFRD drawdown since its inception was -9.69%, smaller than the maximum MEME drawdown of -48.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFRD and MEME.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QFRDMEMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.69%

-48.78%

+39.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.58%

-16.61%

+11.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.86%

-29.66%

+26.80%

Volatility

QFRD vs. MEME - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QFRDMEMEDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.55%

75.50%

-54.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.55%

75.50%

-54.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.55%

75.50%

-54.95%

QFRD vs. MEME - Expense Ratio Comparison

QFRD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than MEME's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

QFRD vs. MEME - Dividend Comparison

QFRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, while MEME has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


QFRD and MEME have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QFRD is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QFRD is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for MEME.

QFRD has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.00% for MEME.

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QFRD and 0.69% for MEME.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QFRD and MEME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer