QFHD vs. TDIV
QFHD (Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF) and TDIV (First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - QFHD is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend Index, while TDIV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QFHD charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TDIV.
Performance
QFHD vs. TDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QFHD
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 1.25%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TDIV
- 1D
- -5.89%
- 1M
- 4.44%
- YTD
- 21.15%
- 6M
- 17.77%
- 1Y
- 41.71%
- 3Y*
- 30.32%
- 5Y*
- 17.52%
- 10Y*
- 18.38%
QFHD vs. TDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QFHD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF | 7.01% |
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund | 18.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between QFHD and TDIV is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2026 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QFHD vs. TDIV — Risk / Return Rank
QFHD
TDIV
QFHD vs. TDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF (QFHD) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QFHD | TDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.82 | 0.84 | +0.98 |
Drawdowns
QFHD vs. TDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QFHD drawdown since its inception was -5.52%, smaller than the maximum TDIV drawdown of -31.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFHD and TDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QFHD | TDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.52% | -31.97% | +26.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.49% | -8.88% | +7.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.13% | -4.84% | +2.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.49% | — |
Volatility
QFHD vs. TDIV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QFHD | TDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.67% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.30% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.37% | 19.46% | -9.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.37% | 20.84% | -10.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.37% | 20.94% | -10.57% |
QFHD vs. TDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
QFHD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than TDIV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
QFHD vs. TDIV - Dividend Comparison
QFHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, more than TDIV's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QFHD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF | 1.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund | 1.20% | 1.40% | 1.59% | 1.74% | 2.51% | 1.76% | 2.07% | 2.27% | 2.97% | 2.27% | 2.45% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QFHD and TDIV have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QFHD is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QFHD is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TDIV.
QFHD has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 1.20% for TDIV.
QFHD is categorized as Dividend, while TDIV is Technology Equities. QFHD tracks S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend Index, while TDIV tracks NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QFHD and 0.50% for TDIV.
Find the right allocation for QFHD and TDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer