PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QFHD vs. TDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QFHD vs. TDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF (QFHD) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


QFHD

1D
0.06%
1M
1.25%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TDIV

1D
-5.89%
1M
4.44%
YTD
21.15%
6M
17.77%
1Y
41.71%
3Y*
30.32%
5Y*
17.52%
10Y*
18.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QFHD vs. TDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QFHD and TDIV is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2026

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QFHD vs. TDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QFHD

TDIV
TDIV Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
TDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
TDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QFHD vs. TDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF (QFHD) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QFHD vs. TDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QFHDTDIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.82

0.84

+0.98

Drawdowns

QFHD vs. TDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QFHD drawdown since its inception was -5.52%, smaller than the maximum TDIV drawdown of -31.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFHD and TDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QFHDTDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.52%

-31.97%

+26.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.49%

-8.88%

+7.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.13%

-4.84%

+2.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

Volatility

QFHD vs. TDIV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QFHDTDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.37%

19.46%

-9.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.37%

20.84%

-10.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.37%

20.94%

-10.57%

QFHD vs. TDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

QFHD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than TDIV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

QFHD vs. TDIV - Dividend Comparison

QFHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, more than TDIV's 1.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QFHD
Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF
1.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
1.20%1.40%1.59%1.74%2.51%1.76%2.07%2.27%2.97%2.27%2.45%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


QFHD and TDIV have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QFHD is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QFHD is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TDIV.

QFHD has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 1.20% for TDIV.

QFHD is categorized as Dividend, while TDIV is Technology Equities. QFHD tracks S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend Index, while TDIV tracks NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QFHD and 0.50% for TDIV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QFHD and TDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer