PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDIV vs. DDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDIV vs. DDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) and First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF (DDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDIV achieves a 21.15% return, which is significantly higher than DDIV's 7.82% return. Over the past 10 years, TDIV has outperformed DDIV with an annualized return of 18.38%, while DDIV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.72% annualized return.


TDIV

1D
-5.89%
1M
4.90%
YTD
21.15%
6M
17.77%
1Y
41.17%
3Y*
30.32%
5Y*
17.52%
10Y*
18.38%

DDIV

1D
-0.69%
1M
0.18%
YTD
7.82%
6M
8.78%
1Y
20.63%
3Y*
20.46%
5Y*
9.45%
10Y*
9.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDIV vs. DDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
21.15%25.27%24.43%36.71%-22.13%29.49%17.55%33.27%-3.18%21.95%
DDIV
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF
7.82%12.23%27.18%9.95%-12.44%39.96%-3.59%32.40%-16.50%11.31%

Correlation

The correlation between TDIV and DDIV is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2014

0.63

The correlation between TDIV and DDIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TDIV vs. DDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TDIV
DDIV

Technology

85.0%
1.1%

Communication Services

13.4%
2.9%

Industrials

1.6%
7.0%

Basic Materials

-

2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-

5.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.1%

Energy

-

27.8%

Financial Services

-

21.5%

Healthcare

-

3.7%

Real Estate

-

15.4%

Utilities

-

5.1%

Technology

TDIV
85.0%
DDIV
1.1%

Communication Services

TDIV
13.4%
DDIV
2.9%

Industrials

TDIV
1.6%
DDIV
7.0%

Basic Materials

TDIV

-

DDIV
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

TDIV

-

DDIV
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

TDIV

-

DDIV
7.1%

Energy

TDIV

-

DDIV
27.8%

Financial Services

TDIV

-

DDIV
21.5%

Healthcare

TDIV

-

DDIV
3.7%

Real Estate

TDIV

-

DDIV
15.4%

Utilities

TDIV

-

DDIV
5.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDIV vs. DDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDIV
TDIV Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
TDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
TDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

DDIV
DDIV Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
DDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
DDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDIV vs. DDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) and First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF (DDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TDIVDDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.28

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.90

1.93

+1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.98

7.10

+4.88

TDIV vs. DDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the DDIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDIV and DDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TDIVDDIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

1.53

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.51

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

0.49

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.47

+0.37

Drawdowns

TDIV vs. DDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDIV drawdown since its inception was -31.97%, smaller than the maximum DDIV drawdown of -47.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDIV and DDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDIVDDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.97%

-47.56%

+15.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.74%

-11.31%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.00%

-18.97%

-4.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.97%

-21.10%

-10.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.97%

-47.56%

+15.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.88%

-1.63%

-7.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.84%

-6.01%

+1.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

3.07%

+0.42%

Volatility

TDIV vs. DDIV - Volatility Comparison

First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) has a higher volatility of 9.67% compared to First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF (DDIV) at 2.66%. This indicates that TDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDIVDDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.67%

2.66%

+7.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.30%

11.70%

+3.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.46%

14.30%

+5.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.84%

18.66%

+2.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.94%

19.90%

+1.04%

TDIV vs. DDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDIV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DDIV's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

TDIV vs. DDIV - Dividend Comparison

TDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than DDIV's 1.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDIV
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF
1.60%1.94%2.22%3.18%3.60%2.43%2.63%2.93%3.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
1.20%1.40%1.59%1.74%2.51%1.76%2.07%2.27%2.97%2.27%2.45%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDIV and DDIV have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TDIV has higher volatility (9.67%) compared to DDIV (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDIV dropped -31.97% vs DDIV's -47.56%.

On 10-year performance, TDIV leads with 18.38% vs 9.72% for DDIV. On fees, TDIV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, DDIV has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TDIV has performed better with a 18.38% return vs 9.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TDIV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DDIV.

DDIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 1.20% for TDIV.

TDIV is categorized as Technology Equities, while DDIV is Momentum. TDIV tracks NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index, while DDIV tracks Dorsey Wright Momentum Plus Dividend Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TDIV and 0.60% for DDIV.

TDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDIV and DDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer