QFHD vs. SPYD
QFHD (Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF) and SPYD (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QFHD is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend Index, while SPYD is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QFHD charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for SPYD.
Performance
QFHD vs. SPYD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QFHD
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 1.25%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPYD
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 1.91%
- YTD
- 11.88%
- 6M
- 12.91%
- 1Y
- 19.05%
- 3Y*
- 14.60%
- 5Y*
- 7.06%
- 10Y*
- 8.58%
QFHD vs. SPYD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QFHD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF | 7.01% |
SPYD State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF | 9.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between QFHD and SPYD is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2026 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QFHD vs. SPYD — Risk / Return Rank
QFHD
SPYD
QFHD vs. SPYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF (QFHD) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QFHD | SPYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.82 | 0.48 | +1.35 |
Drawdowns
QFHD vs. SPYD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QFHD drawdown since its inception was -5.52%, smaller than the maximum SPYD drawdown of -46.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFHD and SPYD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QFHD | SPYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.52% | -46.42% | +40.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.49% | 0.00% | -1.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.13% | -6.17% | +4.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.42% | — |
Volatility
QFHD vs. SPYD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QFHD | SPYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.70% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.72% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.37% | 11.65% | -1.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.37% | 16.13% | -5.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.37% | 19.77% | -9.40% |
QFHD vs. SPYD - Expense Ratio Comparison
QFHD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYD's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
QFHD vs. SPYD - Dividend Comparison
QFHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than SPYD's 4.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QFHD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF | 1.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYD State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF | 4.15% | 4.52% | 4.31% | 4.66% | 5.01% | 3.68% | 4.95% | 4.42% | 4.75% | 4.63% | 4.34% | 1.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QFHD and SPYD have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPYD is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPYD is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for QFHD.
SPYD has the higher dividend yield at 4.15%, compared with 1.34% for QFHD.
QFHD is categorized as Dividend, while SPYD is S&P 500. QFHD tracks S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend Index, while SPYD tracks S&P 500 High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QFHD and 0.07% for SPYD.
Find the right allocation for QFHD and SPYD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer