QFHD vs. RFDA

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

QFHD (Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF) and RFDA (RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QFHD is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend Index, while RFDA is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by SS&C. QFHD is passively managed, while RFDA is actively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QFHD charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for RFDA.

Performance

QFHD vs. RFDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF (QFHD) and RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QFHD

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: 1.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RFDA

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 0.39%
• YTD: 10.78%
• 6M: 9.60%
• 1Y: 25.57%
• 3Y*: 18.64%
• 5Y*: 12.83%
• 10Y*: 13.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QFHD vs. RFDA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
QFHD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF	7.93%
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF	9.96%

Correlation

The correlation between QFHD and RFDA is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026	0.58

Return for Risk

QFHD vs. RFDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QFHD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RFDA

RFDA Risk / Return Rank: 83
RFDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
RFDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
RFDA Omega Ratio Rank: 79
RFDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
RFDA Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QFHD vs. RFDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF (QFHD) and RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QFHD	RFDA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.20	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.04	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.41	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.72	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	16.75	—

Drawdowns

QFHD vs. RFDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QFHD drawdown since its inception was -5.52%, smaller than the maximum RFDA drawdown of -34.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFHD and RFDA.

Drawdown Indicators

	QFHD	RFDA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.52%	-34.60%	+29.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.45%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.35%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.35%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.89%	-1.66%	+0.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.02%	-3.73%	+1.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.53%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QFHD	RFDA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.23%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.77%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.45%	11.69%	-1.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.45%	15.75%	-5.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.45%	16.86%	-6.41%

QFHD vs. RFDA - Expense Ratio Comparison

QFHD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than RFDA's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

QFHD vs. RFDA - Dividend Comparison

QFHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, less than RFDA's 1.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
QFHD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF	1.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF	1.80%	1.89%	2.23%	2.68%	3.57%	1.44%	1.62%	1.87%	2.44%	1.90%	0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QFHD and RFDA in my portfolio?

QFHD and RFDA have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QFHD or RFDA?

On fees, QFHD is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QFHD or RFDA?

QFHD is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for RFDA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QFHD or RFDA?

RFDA has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 1.33% for QFHD.

What is the main difference between QFHD and RFDA?

QFHD is categorized as Dividend, while RFDA is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QFHD and 0.52% for RFDA.