QFHD vs. DFND

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

QFHD (Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF) and DFND (Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QFHD is a Quality Factor fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend Index, while DFND is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index. Both are passively managed. QFHD charges 0.49%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DFND.

Performance

QFHD vs. DFND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF (QFHD) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QFHD

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 1.83%
• 6M: 8.33%
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

DFND

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
QFHD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF	$8.06K	$29.95K	$25.81K

QFHD vs. DFND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
QFHD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF	11.66%
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

QFHD vs. DFND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF (QFHD) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	QFHD	DFND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.91%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.77%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QFHD	DFND	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.91%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.91%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.91%	—	—

QFHD vs. DFND - Expense Ratio Comparison

QFHD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

QFHD vs. DFND - Dividend Comparison

QFHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, while DFND has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF	0.29%	1.10%	1.64%	1.84%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.77%	0.53%	0.02%
QFHD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF	1.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, QFHD or DFND?

On fees, QFHD is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QFHD or DFND?

QFHD is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QFHD or DFND?

QFHD has the higher dividend yield at 1.29%, compared with 0.29% for DFND.

What is the main difference between QFHD and DFND?

QFHD is categorized as Quality Factor, while DFND is Large Cap Blend Equities. QFHD tracks S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend Index, while DFND tracks Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and SRN Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QFHD and 1.50% for DFND.