QEMM vs. SPYG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QEMM (SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QEMM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM Factor Mix A-Series (USD), while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QEMM returned 8.96%/yr vs 18.20%/yr for SPYG. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QEMM charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.

Performance

QEMM vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QEMM achieves a 24.39% return, which is significantly higher than SPYG's 13.75% return. Over the past 10 years, QEMM has underperformed SPYG with an annualized return of 8.96%, while SPYG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.20% annualized return.

QEMM

• 1D: -1.21%
• 1M: 6.69%
• YTD: 24.39%
• 6M: 26.00%
• 1Y: 42.27%
• 3Y*: 19.52%
• 5Y*: 7.37%
• 10Y*: 8.96%

SPYG

• 1D: -0.98%
• 1M: 7.38%
• YTD: 13.75%
• 6M: 13.57%
• 1Y: 33.95%
• 3Y*: 28.16%
• 5Y*: 16.07%
• 10Y*: 18.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QEMM vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QEMM SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF	24.39%	21.92%	4.98%	12.50%	-17.82%	6.34%	9.95%	15.40%	-13.33%	31.50%
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF	13.75%	22.09%	35.99%	30.02%	-29.41%	32.01%	33.46%	30.84%	-0.12%	27.24%

Correlation

The correlation between QEMM and SPYG is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2014	0.58

The correlation between QEMM and SPYG shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (all time) to 0.69 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QEMM vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QEMM	SPYG
Technology	33.8%	51.9%
Financial Services	19.6%	8.5%
Consumer Cyclical	8.3%	8.9%
Industrials	7.2%	5.0%
Communication Services	6.4%	16.8%
Consumer Defensive	6.1%	1.0%
Energy	5.7%	0.1%
Basic Materials	5.6%	0.3%
Healthcare	3.5%	5.8%
Utilities	3.0%	1.2%
Real Estate	0.8%	0.6%

Return for Risk

QEMM vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QEMM

QEMM Risk / Return Rank: 78
QEMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
QEMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
QEMM Omega Ratio Rank: 79
QEMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
QEMM Martin Ratio Rank: 77

SPYG

SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 57
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 59
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QEMM vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QEMM	SPYG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.54	2.12	+0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.41	2.90	+0.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.37	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.08	2.48	+1.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.92	10.25	+4.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QEMM vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QEMM Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QEMM and SPYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QEMM	SPYG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.54	2.12	+0.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	0.76	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53	0.88	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.35	-0.01

Drawdowns

QEMM vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QEMM drawdown since its inception was -36.89%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QEMM and SPYG.

Drawdown Indicators

	QEMM	SPYG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.89%	-67.63%	+30.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.40%	-13.76%	+3.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.03%	-22.14%	+5.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.49%	-32.67%	+5.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.89%	-32.67%	-4.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.21%	-1.13%	-0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.64%	-24.33%	+13.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.84%	3.32%	-0.48%

Volatility

QEMM vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM) has a higher volatility of 7.29% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) at 4.35%. This indicates that QEMM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QEMM	SPYG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.29%	4.35%	+2.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.78%	12.46%	+2.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.69%	16.06%	+0.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.23%	21.17%	-5.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.89%	20.64%	-3.75%

QEMM vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QEMM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

QEMM vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

QEMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, more than SPYG's 0.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QEMM SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF	4.34%	4.90%	5.17%	4.88%	4.07%	2.35%	2.48%	3.05%	2.86%	2.11%	2.03%	2.14%
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF	0.47%	0.52%	0.60%	1.15%	1.03%	0.62%	0.90%	1.37%	1.51%	1.41%	1.55%	1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QEMM and SPYG in my portfolio?

QEMM and SPYG have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QEMM or SPYG?

QEMM has higher volatility (7.29%) compared to SPYG (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QEMM dropped -36.89% vs SPYG's -67.63%.

Which ETF is better, QEMM or SPYG?

On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 18.20% vs 8.96% for QEMM. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 4.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QEMM or SPYG?

Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 18.20% return vs 8.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QEMM or SPYG?

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for QEMM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QEMM or SPYG?

QEMM has the higher dividend yield at 4.34%, compared with 0.47% for SPYG.

What is the main difference between QEMM and SPYG?

QEMM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. QEMM tracks MSCI EM Factor Mix A-Series (USD), while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for QEMM and 0.04% for SPYG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QEMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.