QEMM vs. DVYE
QEMM (SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF) and DVYE (iShares Emerging Markets Dividend ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - QEMM tracks the MSCI EM Factor Mix A-Series (USD) while DVYE tracks the Dow Jones Emerging Markets Select Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QEMM returned 9.15%/yr vs 7.86%/yr for DVYE. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QEMM charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for DVYE.
Performance
QEMM vs. DVYE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QEMM achieves a 24.84% return, which is significantly higher than DVYE's 9.72% return. Over the past 10 years, QEMM has outperformed DVYE with an annualized return of 9.15%, while DVYE has yielded a comparatively lower 7.86% annualized return.
QEMM
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- 6.42%
- YTD
- 24.84%
- 6M
- 27.81%
- 1Y
- 38.47%
- 3Y*
- 18.47%
- 5Y*
- 7.80%
- 10Y*
- 9.15%
DVYE
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- YTD
- 9.72%
- 6M
- 11.84%
- 1Y
- 24.18%
- 3Y*
- 19.96%
- 5Y*
- 4.89%
- 10Y*
- 7.86%
QEMM vs. DVYE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QEMM SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF | 24.84% | 21.92% | 4.98% | 12.50% | -17.82% | 6.34% | 9.95% | 15.40% | -13.33% | 31.50% |
DVYE iShares Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 9.72% | 28.36% | 8.89% | 20.88% | -31.38% | 11.02% | -2.51% | 15.41% | -5.56% | 27.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between QEMM and DVYE is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2014 | 0.76 |
The correlation between QEMM and DVYE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
QEMM vs. DVYE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QEMM
DVYE
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
Technology
QEMM
DVYE
Financial Services
QEMM
DVYE
Consumer Cyclical
QEMM
DVYE
Basic Materials
QEMM
DVYE
Communication Services
QEMM
DVYE
Energy
QEMM
DVYE
Consumer Defensive
QEMM
DVYE
Industrials
QEMM
DVYE
Utilities
QEMM
DVYE
Healthcare
QEMM
DVYE
-
Real Estate
QEMM
DVYE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QEMM vs. DVYE — Risk / Return Rank
QEMM
DVYE
QEMM vs. DVYE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM) and iShares Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (DVYE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QEMM | DVYE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.29 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.71 | 3.42 | +0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.18 | 9.77 | +3.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QEMM vs. DVYE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QEMM drawdown since its inception was -36.89%, smaller than the maximum DVYE drawdown of -47.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QEMM and DVYE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QEMM | DVYE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.89% | -47.42% | +10.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.40% | -7.10% | -3.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.03% | -14.63% | -2.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.19% | -40.89% | +13.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.89% | -40.89% | +4.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.10% | -4.71% | +3.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.61% | -15.35% | +4.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | 2.48% | +0.45% |
Volatility
QEMM vs. DVYE - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM) has a higher volatility of 8.52% compared to iShares Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (DVYE) at 5.66%. This indicates that QEMM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DVYE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QEMM | DVYE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.52% | 5.66% | +2.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.32% | 12.14% | +4.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.03% | 14.81% | +3.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.53% | 17.07% | -1.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.00% | 18.41% | -1.41% |
QEMM vs. DVYE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QEMM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than DVYE's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
QEMM vs. DVYE - Dividend Comparison
QEMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, less than DVYE's 4.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVYE iShares Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 4.91% | 5.88% | 11.81% | 9.05% | 9.89% | 7.31% | 5.27% | 5.97% | 5.69% | 4.81% | 4.56% | 6.53% |
QEMM SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF | 4.32% | 4.90% | 5.17% | 4.88% | 4.07% | 2.35% | 2.48% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 2.11% | 2.03% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QEMM and DVYE have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QEMM has higher volatility (8.52%) compared to DVYE (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QEMM dropped -36.89% vs DVYE's -47.42%.
On 10-year performance, QEMM leads with 9.15% vs 7.86% for DVYE. On fees, QEMM is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, DVYE has been the lower-risk option at 5.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QEMM has performed better with a 9.15% return vs 7.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QEMM is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for DVYE.
DVYE has the higher dividend yield at 4.91%, compared with 4.32% for QEMM.
QEMM tracks MSCI EM Factor Mix A-Series (USD), while DVYE tracks Dow Jones Emerging Markets Select Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for QEMM and 0.49% for DVYE.
QEMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QEMM and DVYE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer