PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QEMM vs. DVYE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QEMM vs. DVYE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM) and iShares Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (DVYE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QEMM achieves a 24.84% return, which is significantly higher than DVYE's 9.72% return. Over the past 10 years, QEMM has outperformed DVYE with an annualized return of 9.15%, while DVYE has yielded a comparatively lower 7.86% annualized return.


QEMM

1D
-1.10%
1M
6.42%
YTD
24.84%
6M
27.81%
1Y
38.47%
3Y*
18.47%
5Y*
7.80%
10Y*
9.15%

DVYE

1D
-0.95%
1M
0.76%
YTD
9.72%
6M
11.84%
1Y
24.18%
3Y*
19.96%
5Y*
4.89%
10Y*
7.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QEMM vs. DVYE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QEMM
SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF
24.84%21.92%4.98%12.50%-17.82%6.34%9.95%15.40%-13.33%31.50%
DVYE
iShares Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
9.72%28.36%8.89%20.88%-31.38%11.02%-2.51%15.41%-5.56%27.04%

Correlation

The correlation between QEMM and DVYE is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2014

0.76

The correlation between QEMM and DVYE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

QEMM vs. DVYE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QEMM
DVYE

Technology

25.7%
8.4%

Financial Services

12.6%
28.5%

Consumer Cyclical

4.9%
4.3%

Basic Materials

3.0%
8.8%

Communication Services

2.6%
1.7%

Energy

2.5%
18.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.1%
2.1%

Industrials

1.9%
17.0%

Utilities

1.5%
7.0%

Healthcare

0.9%

-

Real Estate

0.6%
4.0%

Technology

QEMM
25.7%
DVYE
8.4%

Financial Services

QEMM
12.6%
DVYE
28.5%

Consumer Cyclical

QEMM
4.9%
DVYE
4.3%

Basic Materials

QEMM
3.0%
DVYE
8.8%

Communication Services

QEMM
2.6%
DVYE
1.7%

Energy

QEMM
2.5%
DVYE
18.2%

Consumer Defensive

QEMM
2.1%
DVYE
2.1%

Industrials

QEMM
1.9%
DVYE
17.0%

Utilities

QEMM
1.5%
DVYE
7.0%

Healthcare

QEMM
0.9%
DVYE

-

Real Estate

QEMM
0.6%
DVYE
4.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QEMM vs. DVYE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QEMM
QEMM Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
QEMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QEMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
QEMM Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QEMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
QEMM Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

DVYE
DVYE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
DVYE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVYE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVYE Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
DVYE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVYE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QEMM vs. DVYE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM) and iShares Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (DVYE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QEMMDVYEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.29

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.71

3.42

+0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.18

9.77

+3.41

QEMM vs. DVYE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QEMM Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the DVYE Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QEMM and DVYE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QEMM vs. DVYE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QEMM drawdown since its inception was -36.89%, smaller than the maximum DVYE drawdown of -47.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QEMM and DVYE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QEMMDVYEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.89%

-47.42%

+10.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.40%

-7.10%

-3.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.03%

-14.63%

-2.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.19%

-40.89%

+13.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.89%

-40.89%

+4.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.10%

-4.71%

+3.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.61%

-15.35%

+4.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

2.48%

+0.45%

Volatility

QEMM vs. DVYE - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM) has a higher volatility of 8.52% compared to iShares Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (DVYE) at 5.66%. This indicates that QEMM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DVYE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QEMMDVYEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.52%

5.66%

+2.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.32%

12.14%

+4.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.03%

14.81%

+3.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.53%

17.07%

-1.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.00%

18.41%

-1.41%

QEMM vs. DVYE - Expense Ratio Comparison

QEMM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than DVYE's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

QEMM vs. DVYE - Dividend Comparison

QEMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, less than DVYE's 4.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DVYE
iShares Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
4.91%5.88%11.81%9.05%9.89%7.31%5.27%5.97%5.69%4.81%4.56%6.53%
QEMM
SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF
4.32%4.90%5.17%4.88%4.07%2.35%2.48%3.05%2.86%2.11%2.03%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


QEMM and DVYE have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QEMM has higher volatility (8.52%) compared to DVYE (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QEMM dropped -36.89% vs DVYE's -47.42%.

On 10-year performance, QEMM leads with 9.15% vs 7.86% for DVYE. On fees, QEMM is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, DVYE has been the lower-risk option at 5.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QEMM has performed better with a 9.15% return vs 7.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QEMM is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for DVYE.

DVYE has the higher dividend yield at 4.91%, compared with 4.32% for QEMM.

QEMM tracks MSCI EM Factor Mix A-Series (USD), while DVYE tracks Dow Jones Emerging Markets Select Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for QEMM and 0.49% for DVYE.

QEMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QEMM and DVYE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer