PortfoliosLab logo
QEMM vs. EMGF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between QEMM and EMGF is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

QEMM vs. EMGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM) and iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (EMGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

QEMM:

0.48

EMGF:

0.57

Sortino Ratio

QEMM:

0.69

EMGF:

0.94

Omega Ratio

QEMM:

1.09

EMGF:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

QEMM:

0.38

EMGF:

0.61

Martin Ratio

QEMM:

1.08

EMGF:

1.72

Ulcer Index

QEMM:

5.96%

EMGF:

6.32%

Daily Std Dev

QEMM:

16.27%

EMGF:

18.89%

Max Drawdown

QEMM:

-36.89%

EMGF:

-40.23%

Current Drawdown

QEMM:

-4.37%

EMGF:

-0.97%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QEMM achieves a 4.96% return, which is significantly lower than EMGF's 10.00% return.


QEMM

YTD

4.96%

1M

0.91%

6M

3.63%

1Y

7.74%

3Y*

4.77%

5Y*

5.97%

10Y*

3.48%

EMGF

YTD

10.00%

1M

3.39%

6M

7.26%

1Y

10.60%

3Y*

7.15%

5Y*

8.49%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QEMM vs. EMGF - Expense Ratio Comparison

QEMM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than EMGF's 0.45% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

QEMM vs. EMGF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QEMM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QEMM is 3737
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QEMM is 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QEMM is 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QEMM is 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QEMM is 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QEMM is 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

EMGF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EMGF is 5151
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EMGF is 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EMGF is 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EMGF is 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EMGF is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EMGF is 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

QEMM vs. EMGF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM) and iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (EMGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current QEMM Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is comparable to the EMGF Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QEMM and EMGF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

QEMM vs. EMGF - Dividend Comparison

QEMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, more than EMGF's 3.11% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
QEMM
SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF
2.92%5.17%4.88%4.07%2.35%2.48%3.05%2.86%2.11%2.03%2.14%1.56%
EMGF
iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
3.11%3.42%5.94%4.04%2.48%1.95%2.63%2.73%1.95%2.04%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

QEMM vs. EMGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QEMM drawdown since its inception was -36.89%, smaller than the maximum EMGF drawdown of -40.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QEMM and EMGF.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

QEMM vs. EMGF - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM) has a higher volatility of 3.73% compared to iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (EMGF) at 3.53%. This indicates that QEMM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...