QEMM vs. EMGF

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

QEMM (SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF) and EMGF (iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - QEMM tracks the MSCI EM Factor Mix A-Series (USD) while EMGF tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Diversified Multiple-Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QEMM returned 7.77%/yr vs 9.61%/yr for EMGF. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. QEMM charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EMGF.

Performance

QEMM vs. EMGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM) and iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (EMGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QEMM having a 19.15% return and EMGF slightly lower at 18.62%. Over the past 10 years, QEMM has underperformed EMGF with an annualized return of 7.77%, while EMGF has yielded a comparatively higher 9.61% annualized return.

QEMM

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: -0.89%
• 6M: 11.72%
• YTD: 19.15%
• 1Y: 30.93%
• 3Y*: 16.10%
• 5Y*: 7.53%
• 10Y*: 7.77%
• ALL TIME*: 5.36%

EMGF

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: -3.34%
• 6M: 9.69%
• YTD: 18.62%
• 1Y: 33.99%
• 3Y*: 20.71%
• 5Y*: 9.49%
• 10Y*: 9.61%
• ALL TIME*: 10.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EMGF iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF	$9.26M	$12.00M	$11.68M
QEMM SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF	$139.93K	$185.83K	$306.66K

QEMM vs. EMGF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QEMM SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF	19.15%	21.92%	4.98%	12.50%	-17.82%	6.34%	9.95%	15.40%	-13.33%	31.50%
EMGF iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF	18.62%	31.41%	9.06%	10.86%	-16.55%	6.65%	10.27%	20.96%	-19.71%	42.37%

Correlation

The correlation between QEMM and EMGF is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2015	0.86

The correlation between QEMM and EMGF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

QEMM vs. EMGF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QEMM	EMGF
Technology	36.5%	42.6%
Financial Services	19.8%	17.8%
Consumer Cyclical	8.0%	8.2%
Basic Materials	6.7%	5.0%
Industrials	6.6%	7.5%
Communication Services	6.6%	6.4%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	3.1%
Energy	4.3%	3.4%
Healthcare	3.4%	2.7%
Utilities	2.4%	2.2%
Real Estate	0.8%	1.0%

Return for Risk

QEMM vs. EMGF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QEMM

QEMM Risk / Return Rank: 72
QEMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
QEMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
QEMM Omega Ratio Rank: 71
QEMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
QEMM Martin Ratio Rank: 72

EMGF

EMGF Risk / Return Rank: 59
EMGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
EMGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
EMGF Omega Ratio Rank: 60
EMGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
EMGF Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QEMM vs. EMGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM) and iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (EMGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QEMM	EMGF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.58	1.36	+0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.15	1.88	+0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.26	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.94	2.25	+0.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.89	7.04	+1.85

QEMM vs. EMGF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QEMM Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the EMGF Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QEMM and EMGF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QEMM vs. EMGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QEMM drawdown since its inception was -36.89%, smaller than the maximum EMGF drawdown of -40.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QEMM and EMGF.

Drawdown Indicators

	QEMM	EMGF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.89%	-40.23%	+3.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.40%	-14.63%	+4.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.03%	-17.65%	+0.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.12%	-28.17%	+1.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.89%	-40.23%	+3.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.61%	-10.79%	+5.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.56%	-10.01%	-0.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.43%	4.67%	-1.24%

Volatility

QEMM vs. EMGF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM) is 6.14%, while iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (EMGF) has a volatility of 8.59%. This indicates that QEMM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QEMM	EMGF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.14%	8.59%	-2.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.61%	22.28%	-4.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.34%	24.21%	-4.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.79%	18.66%	-2.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.02%	19.79%	-2.77%

QEMM vs. EMGF - Expense Ratio Comparison

QEMM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than EMGF's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

QEMM vs. EMGF - Dividend Comparison

QEMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, more than EMGF's 2.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EMGF iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF	2.12%	2.52%	3.42%	5.94%	4.04%	2.48%	1.95%	2.63%	2.73%	1.94%	2.04%	0.00%
QEMM SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF	4.53%	4.90%	5.17%	4.88%	4.07%	2.35%	2.48%	3.05%	2.86%	2.11%	2.03%	2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QEMM and EMGF in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, QEMM and EMGF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, QEMM or EMGF?

EMGF has higher volatility (8.59%) compared to QEMM (6.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QEMM dropped -36.89% vs EMGF's -40.23%.

Which ETF is better, QEMM or EMGF?

On 10-year performance, EMGF leads with 9.61% vs 7.77% for QEMM. On fees, QEMM is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, QEMM has been the lower-risk option at 6.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QEMM or EMGF?

Over the 10-year period, EMGF has performed better with a 9.61% return vs 7.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QEMM or EMGF?

QEMM is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for EMGF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QEMM or EMGF?

QEMM has the higher dividend yield at 4.53%, compared with 2.12% for EMGF.

What is the main difference between QEMM and EMGF?

QEMM tracks MSCI EM Factor Mix A-Series (USD), while EMGF tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Diversified Multiple-Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for QEMM and 0.45% for EMGF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QEMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.