PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
QEMM vs. URTH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between QEMM and URTH is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

QEMM vs. URTH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM) and iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-4.00%-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.47%
8.04%
QEMM
URTH

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

QEMM:

0.66

URTH:

1.68

Sortino Ratio

QEMM:

0.99

URTH:

2.29

Omega Ratio

QEMM:

1.12

URTH:

1.30

Calmar Ratio

QEMM:

0.67

URTH:

2.45

Martin Ratio

QEMM:

1.84

URTH:

9.70

Ulcer Index

QEMM:

4.50%

URTH:

2.08%

Daily Std Dev

QEMM:

12.60%

URTH:

12.06%

Max Drawdown

QEMM:

-36.89%

URTH:

-34.01%

Current Drawdown

QEMM:

-6.47%

URTH:

-0.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QEMM achieves a 2.65% return, which is significantly lower than URTH's 5.49% return. Over the past 10 years, QEMM has underperformed URTH with an annualized return of 3.50%, while URTH has yielded a comparatively higher 10.36% annualized return.


QEMM

YTD

2.65%

1M

2.36%

6M

-0.47%

1Y

7.18%

5Y*

3.94%

10Y*

3.50%

URTH

YTD

5.49%

1M

3.55%

6M

8.04%

1Y

20.99%

5Y*

12.07%

10Y*

10.36%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QEMM vs. URTH - Expense Ratio Comparison

QEMM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than URTH's 0.24% expense ratio.


QEMM
SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF
Expense ratio chart for QEMM: current value at 0.30% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.30%
Expense ratio chart for URTH: current value at 0.24% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.24%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

QEMM vs. URTH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QEMM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QEMM is 2424
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QEMM is 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QEMM is 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QEMM is 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QEMM is 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QEMM is 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

URTH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of URTH is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of URTH is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of URTH is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of URTH is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of URTH is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of URTH is 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

QEMM vs. URTH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM) and iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for QEMM, currently valued at 0.66, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.661.68
The chart of Sortino ratio for QEMM, currently valued at 0.99, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.992.29
The chart of Omega ratio for QEMM, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.121.30
The chart of Calmar ratio for QEMM, currently valued at 0.67, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.672.45
The chart of Martin ratio for QEMM, currently valued at 1.84, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.001.849.70
QEMM
URTH

The current QEMM Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the URTH Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QEMM and URTH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.66
1.68
QEMM
URTH

Dividends

QEMM vs. URTH - Dividend Comparison

QEMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, more than URTH's 1.40% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
QEMM
SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF
5.03%5.17%4.88%4.07%2.35%2.48%3.05%2.86%2.11%2.03%2.14%1.56%
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
1.40%1.47%1.70%1.68%1.50%1.52%2.16%2.30%1.88%2.14%2.35%2.32%

Drawdowns

QEMM vs. URTH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QEMM drawdown since its inception was -36.89%, which is greater than URTH's maximum drawdown of -34.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QEMM and URTH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-6.47%
-0.04%
QEMM
URTH

Volatility

QEMM vs. URTH - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM) has a higher volatility of 3.19% compared to iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) at 2.90%. This indicates that QEMM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
3.19%
2.90%
QEMM
URTH
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab