PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDIV vs. EFAV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDIV vs. EFAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) and iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDIV achieves a 8.38% return, which is significantly higher than EFAV's 3.77% return.


QDIV

1D
-0.36%
1M
1.92%
YTD
8.38%
6M
8.73%
1Y
13.98%
3Y*
9.65%
5Y*
6.36%
10Y*

EFAV

1D
0.61%
1M
-1.89%
YTD
3.77%
6M
6.13%
1Y
8.96%
3Y*
12.84%
5Y*
6.01%
10Y*
6.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDIV vs. EFAV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
QDIV
Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF
8.38%3.16%10.62%5.18%-0.50%28.99%0.03%29.00%-12.20%
EFAV
iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF
3.77%26.00%5.30%12.52%-15.11%7.20%-0.06%16.67%-6.55%

Correlation

The correlation between QDIV and EFAV is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2018

0.57

The correlation between QDIV and EFAV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

QDIV vs. EFAV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QDIV
EFAV

Consumer Defensive

21.9%
11.5%

Industrials

16.5%
15.1%

Healthcare

14.3%
12.4%

Energy

14.1%
8.2%

Basic Materials

8.4%
1.6%

Technology

8.1%
4.5%

Financial Services

6.9%
19.9%

Consumer Cyclical

6.1%
5.2%

Communication Services

3.7%
9.7%

Real Estate

-

2.9%

Utilities

-

9.1%

Consumer Defensive

QDIV
21.9%
EFAV
11.5%

Industrials

QDIV
16.5%
EFAV
15.1%

Healthcare

QDIV
14.3%
EFAV
12.4%

Energy

QDIV
14.1%
EFAV
8.2%

Basic Materials

QDIV
8.4%
EFAV
1.6%

Technology

QDIV
8.1%
EFAV
4.5%

Financial Services

QDIV
6.9%
EFAV
19.9%

Consumer Cyclical

QDIV
6.1%
EFAV
5.2%

Communication Services

QDIV
3.7%
EFAV
9.7%

Real Estate

QDIV

-

EFAV
2.9%

Utilities

QDIV

-

EFAV
9.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDIV vs. EFAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDIV
QDIV Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
QDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
QDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

EFAV
EFAV Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
EFAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAV Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAV Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDIV vs. EFAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) and iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDIVEFAVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.16

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

1.39

+0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.52

3.77

+0.74

QDIV vs. EFAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is higher than the EFAV Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDIV and EFAV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDIVEFAVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

0.86

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.51

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.53

-0.10

Drawdowns

QDIV vs. EFAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDIV drawdown since its inception was -41.20%, which is greater than EFAV's maximum drawdown of -27.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDIV and EFAV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDIVEFAVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.20%

-27.56%

-13.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.97%

-6.46%

-1.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.81%

-8.75%

-8.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.52%

-27.46%

+8.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.81%

-5.66%

+1.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.54%

-4.77%

-0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

2.38%

+0.72%

Volatility

QDIV vs. EFAV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) is 2.46%, while iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) has a volatility of 2.86%. This indicates that QDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDIVEFAVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.46%

2.86%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.99%

8.30%

-0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.81%

10.43%

+1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.30%

11.80%

+3.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.41%

13.22%

+6.19%

QDIV vs. EFAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QDIV and EFAV have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QDIV vs. EFAV - Dividend Comparison

QDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, less than EFAV's 3.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFAV
iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF
3.08%3.20%3.24%3.08%2.53%2.47%1.33%4.19%3.34%2.45%3.94%2.49%
QDIV
Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF
2.99%3.13%2.88%3.26%3.02%2.44%3.06%2.84%1.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDIV and EFAV have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EFAV has higher volatility (2.86%) compared to QDIV (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDIV dropped -41.20% vs EFAV's -27.56%.

On 5-year performance, QDIV leads with 6.36% vs 6.01% for EFAV. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. On volatility, QDIV has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QDIV has performed better with a 6.36% return vs 6.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QDIV and EFAV have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

EFAV has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 2.99% for QDIV.

QDIV is categorized as Dividend, while EFAV is Foreign Large Cap Equities. QDIV tracks S&P 500 Quality High Dividend Index, while EFAV tracks MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares.

QDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDIV and EFAV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer