QDIV vs. DGRW
QDIV (Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF) and DGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund) are both Dividend funds - QDIV tracks the S&P 500 Quality High Dividend Index while DGRW tracks the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QDIV returned 6.89%/yr vs 11.78%/yr for DGRW. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QDIV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for DGRW.
Performance
QDIV vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDIV achieves a 7.99% return, which is significantly higher than DGRW's 6.36% return.
QDIV
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- -0.97%
- YTD
- 7.99%
- 6M
- 7.73%
- 1Y
- 13.66%
- 3Y*
- 9.64%
- 5Y*
- 6.89%
- 10Y*
- —
DGRW
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 6.36%
- 6M
- 5.72%
- 1Y
- 16.86%
- 3Y*
- 15.10%
- 5Y*
- 11.78%
- 10Y*
- 14.14%
QDIV vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDIV Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF | 7.99% | 3.16% | 10.62% | 5.18% | -0.50% | 28.99% | 0.03% | 29.00% | -12.20% |
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 6.36% | 12.17% | 16.98% | 18.66% | -6.33% | 24.46% | 13.87% | 29.54% | -7.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDIV and DGRW is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2018 | 0.78 |
The correlation between QDIV and DGRW shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QDIV vs. DGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QDIV
DGRW
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Technology
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
QDIV
DGRW
Industrials
QDIV
DGRW
Healthcare
QDIV
DGRW
Energy
QDIV
DGRW
Technology
QDIV
DGRW
Basic Materials
QDIV
DGRW
Financial Services
QDIV
DGRW
Consumer Cyclical
QDIV
DGRW
Communication Services
QDIV
DGRW
Real Estate
QDIV
-
DGRW
-
Utilities
QDIV
-
DGRW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDIV vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank
QDIV
DGRW
QDIV vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QDIV | DGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.30 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 2.04 | -0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.31 | 8.67 | -4.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QDIV vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDIV drawdown since its inception was -41.20%, which is greater than DGRW's maximum drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDIV and DGRW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDIV | DGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.20% | -32.04% | -9.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.97% | -8.30% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.81% | -16.21% | -0.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.52% | -17.27% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.15% | -3.32% | -0.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.53% | -3.01% | -2.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 1.95% | +1.22% |
Volatility
QDIV vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) is 3.42%, while WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) has a volatility of 3.75%. This indicates that QDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDIV | DGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.42% | 3.75% | -0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.08% | 8.26% | -0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.00% | 10.30% | +1.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.26% | 14.01% | +1.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.38% | 16.21% | +3.17% |
QDIV vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDIV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDIV vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison
QDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, more than DGRW's 1.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 1.30% | 1.43% | 1.55% | 1.74% | 2.15% | 1.78% | 1.93% | 2.20% | 2.42% | 1.71% | 2.13% | 2.18% |
QDIV Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF | 3.00% | 3.13% | 2.88% | 3.26% | 3.02% | 2.44% | 3.06% | 2.84% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDIV and DGRW have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DGRW has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to QDIV (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDIV dropped -41.20% vs DGRW's -32.04%.
On 5-year performance, DGRW leads with 11.78% vs 6.89% for QDIV. On fees, QDIV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, QDIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DGRW has performed better with a 11.78% return vs 6.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QDIV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for DGRW.
QDIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.00%, compared with 1.30% for DGRW.
QDIV tracks S&P 500 Quality High Dividend Index, while DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QDIV and 0.28% for DGRW.
DGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QDIV and DGRW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer