QBY vs. PLTM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QBY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF) and PLTM (GraniteShares Platinum Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - QBY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while PLTM is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt). QBY is actively managed, while PLTM is passively managed. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QBY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PLTM.

Performance

QBY vs. PLTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF (QBY) and GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBY achieves a -25.84% return, which is significantly lower than PLTM's -9.33% return.

QBY

• 1D: -1.00%
• 1M: 1.65%
• YTD: -25.84%
• 6M: -31.16%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PLTM

• 1D: -3.82%
• 1M: -4.28%
• YTD: -9.33%
• 6M: 11.67%
• 1Y: 71.85%
• 3Y*: 22.22%
• 5Y*: 9.22%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBY vs. PLTM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QBY GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF	-25.84%	-8.88%
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust	-9.33%	31.71%

Correlation

The correlation between QBY and PLTM is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2025	0.34

Return for Risk

QBY vs. PLTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTM

PLTM Risk / Return Rank: 36
PLTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
PLTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
PLTM Omega Ratio Rank: 39
PLTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
PLTM Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBY vs. PLTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF (QBY) and GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QBY	PLTM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.41	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.28	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.63	0.24	-1.87

Drawdowns

QBY vs. PLTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBY drawdown since its inception was -38.93%, smaller than the maximum PLTM drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBY and PLTM.

Drawdown Indicators

	QBY	PLTM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.93%	-42.32%	+3.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-34.52%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-34.52%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.95%	-33.02%	+0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.40%	-18.55%	-6.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	16.28%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QBY	PLTM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	10.88%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	45.45%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.96%	51.40%	-18.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.96%	32.83%	+0.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.96%	30.98%	+1.98%

QBY vs. PLTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

QBY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTM's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

QBY vs. PLTM - Dividend Comparison

QBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 101.11%, while PLTM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust	0.00%	0.00%
QBY GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF	101.11%	15.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QBY and PLTM in my portfolio?

QBY and PLTM have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QBY or PLTM?

On fees, PLTM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QBY or PLTM?

PLTM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for QBY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QBY or PLTM?

QBY has the higher dividend yield at 101.11%, compared with 0.00% for PLTM.

What is the main difference between QBY and PLTM?

QBY is categorized as Derivative Income, while PLTM is Precious Metals. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for QBY and 0.50% for PLTM.