QBY vs. NVD

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

QBY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF) and NVD (GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QBY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while NVD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.31, they often move in opposite directions. QBY charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for NVD.

Performance

QBY vs. NVD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF (QBY) and GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBY achieves a -26.67% return, which is significantly higher than NVD's -32.59% return.

QBY

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: -26.67%
• 6M: -31.10%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NVD

• 1D: 1.47%
• 1M: 2.34%
• YTD: -32.59%
• 6M: -34.75%
• 1Y: -64.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBY vs. NVD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QBY GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF	-26.67%	-8.88%
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF	-32.59%	-5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between QBY and NVD is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025	-0.31

Return for Risk

QBY vs. NVD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NVD

NVD Risk / Return Rank: 1
NVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
NVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
NVD Omega Ratio Rank: 2
NVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
NVD Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBY vs. NVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF (QBY) and GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QBY	NVD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.92	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-1.51	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.83	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.91	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.38	—

Drawdowns

QBY vs. NVD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBY drawdown since its inception was -38.93%, smaller than the maximum NVD drawdown of -99.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBY and NVD.

Drawdown Indicators

	QBY	NVD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.93%	-99.26%	+60.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-70.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.71%	-99.09%	+65.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.96%	-81.83%	+55.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	47.12%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QBY	NVD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	25.75%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	54.01%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.87%	70.84%	-38.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.87%	92.50%	-60.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.87%	92.50%	-60.63%

QBY vs. NVD - Expense Ratio Comparison

QBY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than NVD's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

QBY vs. NVD - Dividend Comparison

QBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 114.26%, more than NVD's 17.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF	17.54%	11.83%	8.68%	15.78%
QBY GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF	114.26%	15.05%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QBY and NVD in my portfolio?

QBY and NVD have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QBY or NVD?

On fees, QBY is cheaper at 1.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QBY or NVD?

QBY is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for NVD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QBY or NVD?

QBY has the higher dividend yield at 114.26%, compared with 17.54% for NVD.

What is the main difference between QBY and NVD?

QBY is categorized as Derivative Income, while NVD is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for QBY and 1.50% for NVD.