QBY vs. AMDL

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

QBY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF) and AMDL (GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QBY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while AMDL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QBY charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for AMDL.

Performance

QBY vs. AMDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF (QBY) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBY achieves a -26.67% return, which is significantly lower than AMDL's 386.95% return.

QBY

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: -26.67%
• 6M: -31.10%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMDL

• 1D: 5.43%
• 1M: 30.82%
• YTD: 386.95%
• 6M: 382.29%
• 1Y: 978.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBY vs. AMDL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QBY GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF	-26.67%	-8.88%
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF	386.95%	-3.30%

Correlation

The correlation between QBY and AMDL is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025	0.46

Return for Risk

QBY vs. AMDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AMDL

AMDL Risk / Return Rank: 95
AMDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
AMDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
AMDL Omega Ratio Rank: 91
AMDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
AMDL Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBY vs. AMDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF (QBY) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QBY	AMDL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	7.39	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	4.31	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.57	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	17.62	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	34.27	—

Drawdowns

QBY vs. AMDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBY drawdown since its inception was -38.93%, smaller than the maximum AMDL drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBY and AMDL.

Drawdown Indicators

	QBY	AMDL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.93%	-88.63%	+49.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-56.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.71%	-1.66%	-32.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.96%	-47.80%	+21.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	28.80%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QBY	AMDL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	46.96%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	101.28%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.87%	134.09%	-102.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.87%	118.34%	-86.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.87%	118.34%	-86.47%

QBY vs. AMDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

QBY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDL's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

QBY vs. AMDL - Dividend Comparison

QBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 114.26%, while AMDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
QBY GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF	114.26%	15.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QBY and AMDL in my portfolio?

QBY and AMDL have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QBY or AMDL?

On fees, QBY is cheaper at 1.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QBY or AMDL?

QBY is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for AMDL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QBY or AMDL?

QBY has the higher dividend yield at 114.26%, compared with 0.00% for AMDL.

What is the main difference between QBY and AMDL?

QBY is categorized as Derivative Income, while AMDL is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for QBY and 1.15% for AMDL.