QBY vs. ARMW
QBY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF) and ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QBY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for ARMW.
Performance
QBY vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QBY achieves a -26.67% return, which is significantly lower than ARMW's 356.51% return.
QBY
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- -26.67%
- 6M
- -31.10%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARMW
- 1D
- -8.12%
- 1M
- 40.26%
- YTD
- 356.51%
- 6M
- 337.80%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QBY vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QBY GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF | -26.67% | -8.88% |
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 356.51% | -22.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between QBY and ARMW is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QBY vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF (QBY) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QBY vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QBY drawdown since its inception was -38.93%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBY and ARMW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QBY | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.93% | -48.47% | +9.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.71% | -8.12% | -25.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.96% | -25.32% | -0.64% |
Volatility
QBY vs. ARMW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QBY | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.87% | 93.49% | -61.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.87% | 93.49% | -61.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.87% | 93.49% | -61.62% |
QBY vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison
QBY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
QBY vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison
QBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 114.26%, more than ARMW's 22.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 22.59% | 16.38% |
QBY GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF | 114.26% | 15.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QBY and ARMW have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for QBY.
QBY has the higher dividend yield at 114.26%, compared with 22.59% for ARMW.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for QBY and 0.99% for ARMW.
Find the right allocation for QBY and ARMW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer