QB vs. QLD

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

QB (ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) and QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - QB is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Nasdaq-100, while QLD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QB returned 18.83% vs 54.67% for QLD. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QB charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for QLD.

Performance

QB vs. QLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QB achieves a 12.67% return, which is significantly lower than QLD's 30.96% return.

QB

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 3.50%
• 6M: 11.39%
• YTD: 12.67%
• 1Y: 18.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QLD

• 1D: 2.22%
• 1M: -1.27%
• 6M: 26.30%
• YTD: 30.96%
• 1Y: 54.67%
• 3Y*: 40.14%
• 5Y*: 20.25%
• 10Y*: 34.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QB vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	12.67%	6.10%
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	30.96%	24.33%

Correlation

The correlation between QB and QLD is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.83

The correlation between QB and QLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

QB vs. QLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QB	QLD
Technology	49.9%	58.7%
Communication Services	16.4%	14.3%
Consumer Cyclical	12.5%	11.4%
Consumer Defensive	8.6%	6.4%
Healthcare	5.3%	3.7%
Industrials	3.7%	2.6%
Utilities	1.6%	1.2%
Basic Materials	1.3%	1.0%
Energy	0.6%	0.5%
Financial Services	0.2%	0.2%
Real Estate	0.1%	0.1%

Return for Risk

QB vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QB

QB Risk / Return Rank: 95
QB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
QB Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
QB Omega Ratio Rank: 96
QB Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
QB Martin Ratio Rank: 96

QLD

QLD Risk / Return Rank: 52
QLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
QLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
QLD Omega Ratio Rank: 50
QLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
QLD Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QB vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QB	QLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.69	1.48	+1.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.91	1.96	+1.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.64	1.26	+0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.44	2.19	+3.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	26.25	7.14	+19.11

QB vs. QLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QB Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is higher than the QLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QB and QLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QB vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QB drawdown since its inception was -3.47%, smaller than the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QB and QLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	QB	QLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.47%	-83.13%	+79.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.47%	-25.13%	+21.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-42.29%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-63.68%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-63.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-8.29%	+8.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.42%	-18.11%	+17.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.72%	7.68%	-6.96%

Volatility

QB vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB) is 2.86%, while ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a volatility of 16.07%. This indicates that QB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QB	QLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.86%	16.07%	-13.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.82%	30.65%	-24.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.03%	37.05%	-30.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.93%	45.57%	-38.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.93%	44.86%	-37.93%

QB vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

QB has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than QLD's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

QB vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison

QB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, more than QLD's 0.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	0.77%	0.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	0.13%	0.17%	0.25%	0.33%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.13%	0.06%	0.02%	0.21%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QB and QLD in my portfolio?

QB and QLD have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QB or QLD?

QLD has higher volatility (16.07%) compared to QB (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QB dropped -3.47% vs QLD's -83.13%.

Which ETF is better, QB or QLD?

On 1-year performance, QLD leads with 54.67% vs 18.83% for QB. On fees, QB is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, QB has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QB or QLD?

Over the 1-year period, QLD has performed better with a 54.67% return vs 18.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QB or QLD?

QB is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QB or QLD?

QB has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.13% for QLD.

What is the main difference between QB and QLD?

QB is categorized as Defined Outcome, while QLD is Leveraged Equities. QB tracks Nasdaq-100, while QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). Their fees differ too: 0.58% for QB and 0.95% for QLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.