QB vs. JEPQ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QB (ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) and JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QB is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Nasdaq-100, while JEPQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QB charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPQ.

Performance

QB vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QB achieves a 9.56% return, which is significantly higher than JEPQ's 7.85% return.

QB

• 1D: -1.22%
• 1M: -0.18%
• YTD: 9.56%
• 6M: 9.37%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JEPQ

• 1D: -2.48%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 7.85%
• 6M: 7.02%
• 1Y: 25.10%
• 3Y*: 19.79%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QB vs. JEPQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	9.56%	6.10%
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF	7.85%	14.53%

Correlation

The correlation between QB and JEPQ is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.76

QB vs. JEPQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QB	JEPQ
Technology	49.9%	58.9%
Communication Services	16.4%	13.9%
Consumer Cyclical	12.5%	11.8%
Consumer Defensive	8.6%	6.0%
Healthcare	5.3%	3.9%
Industrials	3.7%	2.8%
Utilities	1.6%	1.1%
Basic Materials	1.3%	0.9%
Energy	0.6%	0.3%
Financial Services	0.2%	0.3%
Real Estate	0.1%	0.2%

Return for Risk

QB vs. JEPQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

JEPQ

JEPQ Risk / Return Rank: 63
JEPQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
JEPQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
JEPQ Omega Ratio Rank: 66
JEPQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
JEPQ Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QB vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QB	JEPQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.93	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.57	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.38	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.86	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	13.55	—

Drawdowns

QB vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QB drawdown since its inception was -3.47%, smaller than the maximum JEPQ drawdown of -20.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QB and JEPQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	QB	JEPQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.47%	-20.07%	+16.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.82%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.51%	-2.48%	+0.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.41%	-3.40%	+2.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.86%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QB	JEPQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.27%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.58%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.85%	13.08%	-6.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.85%	16.79%	-9.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.85%	16.79%	-9.94%

QB vs. JEPQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QB has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than JEPQ's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

QB vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison

QB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than JEPQ's 10.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF	10.22%	10.53%	9.65%	10.03%	9.44%
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	0.63%	0.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QB and JEPQ in my portfolio?

QB and JEPQ have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QB or JEPQ?

On fees, JEPQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QB or JEPQ?

JEPQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for QB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QB or JEPQ?

JEPQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.22%, compared with 0.63% for QB.

What is the main difference between QB and JEPQ?

QB is categorized as Defined Outcome, while JEPQ is Nasdaq-100. QB tracks Nasdaq-100, while JEPQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for QB and 0.35% for JEPQ.