PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QB vs. QQQY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QB vs. QQQY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QB achieves a 13.84% return, which is significantly higher than QQQY's 12.11% return.


QB

1D
0.29%
1M
2.50%
6M
12.93%
YTD
13.84%
1Y
21.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.82%

QQQY

1D
0.50%
1M
-3.16%
6M
11.25%
YTD
12.11%
1Y
21.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$58.82K$37.73K$149.66K
$1.79M$2.09M$2.92M

QB vs. QQQY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QB and QQQY is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.79

The correlation between QB and QQQY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QB vs. QQQY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QB
QB Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
QB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
QB Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
QB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
QB Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQY
QQQY Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
QQQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQY Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQY Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QB vs. QQQY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QBQQQYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.21

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.83

1.72

+4.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

27.99

6.07

+21.92

QB vs. QQQY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QB Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is higher than the QQQY Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QB and QQQY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QB vs. QQQY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QB drawdown since its inception was -3.47%, smaller than the maximum QQQY drawdown of -19.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QB and QQQY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QBQQQYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.47%

-19.05%

+15.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.47%

-11.14%

+7.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.19%

+6.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.42%

-2.96%

+2.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.72%

3.15%

-2.43%

Volatility

QB vs. QQQY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB) is 2.32%, while Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) has a volatility of 6.53%. This indicates that QB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QBQQQYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.32%

6.53%

-4.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.04%

15.23%

-9.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.27%

17.41%

-10.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.01%

15.75%

-8.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.01%

15.75%

-8.74%

QB vs. QQQY - Expense Ratio Comparison

QB has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

QB vs. QQQY - Dividend Comparison

QB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than QQQY's 37.47% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
QB
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF
0.77%0.48%0.00%0.00%
QQQY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF
37.47%45.34%83.34%20.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


QB and QQQY have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQY has higher volatility (6.53%) compared to QB (2.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QB dropped -3.47% vs QQQY's -19.05%.

On 1-year performance, QQQY leads with 21.17% vs 21.06% for QB. On fees, QB is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, QB has been the lower-risk option at 2.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQY has performed better with a 21.17% return vs 21.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QB is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for QQQY.

QQQY has the higher dividend yield at 37.47%, compared with 0.77% for QB.

QB is categorized as Defined Outcome, while QQQY is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for QB and 0.99% for QQQY.

QB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QB and QQQY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer