QB vs. QCJL
QB (ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) and QCJL (FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - July) are both exchange-traded funds - QB is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Nasdaq-100, while QCJL is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by First Trust. QB is passively managed, while QCJL is actively managed. Over the past year, QB returned 18.28% vs 11.50% for QCJL. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QB charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for QCJL.
Performance
QB vs. QCJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QB achieves a 12.15% return, which is significantly higher than QCJL's 5.86% return.
QB
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 3.02%
- 6M
- 10.85%
- YTD
- 12.15%
- 1Y
- 18.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QCJL
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- 6M
- 5.17%
- YTD
- 5.86%
- 1Y
- 11.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QB vs. QCJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 12.15% | 6.10% |
QCJL FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - July | 5.86% | 6.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between QB and QCJL is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.64 |
The correlation between QB and QCJL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QB vs. QCJL — Risk / Return Rank
QB
QCJL
QB vs. QCJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB) and FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - July (QCJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QB | QCJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.42 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.28 | 2.88 | +2.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.48 | 14.72 | +10.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QB vs. QCJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QB drawdown since its inception was -3.47%, smaller than the maximum QCJL drawdown of -11.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QB and QCJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QB | QCJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.47% | -11.18% | +7.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.47% | -4.00% | +0.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.31% | 0.00% | -0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.42% | -1.02% | +0.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.72% | 0.78% | -0.06% |
Volatility
QB vs. QCJL - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB) has a higher volatility of 3.05% compared to FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - July (QCJL) at 0.54%. This indicates that QB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QCJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QB | QCJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.05% | 0.54% | +2.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.83% | 4.16% | +1.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.03% | 5.55% | +1.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.93% | 9.23% | -2.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.93% | 9.23% | -2.30% |
QB vs. QCJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
QB has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than QCJL's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
QB vs. QCJL - Dividend Comparison
QB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, while QCJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 0.78% | 0.48% |
QCJL FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QB and QCJL have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QB has higher volatility (3.05%) compared to QCJL (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QB dropped -3.47% vs QCJL's -11.18%.
On 1-year performance, QB leads with 18.28% vs 11.50% for QCJL. On fees, QB is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, QCJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QB has performed better with a 18.28% return vs 11.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QB is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for QCJL.
QB has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.00% for QCJL.
QB is categorized as Defined Outcome, while QCJL is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for QB and 0.90% for QCJL.
QB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QB and QCJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer