PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PYPL vs. UCO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PYPL vs. UCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYPL achieves a -26.79% return, which is significantly lower than UCO's 149.12% return. Over the past 10 years, PYPL has outperformed UCO with an annualized return of 1.12%, while UCO has yielded a comparatively lower -11.31% annualized return.


PYPL

1D
-4.31%
1M
-15.44%
YTD
-26.79%
6M
-30.21%
1Y
-39.94%
3Y*
-12.51%
5Y*
-30.44%
10Y*
1.12%

UCO

1D
2.71%
1M
-4.64%
YTD
149.12%
6M
137.09%
1Y
120.48%
3Y*
25.90%
5Y*
22.16%
10Y*
-11.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYPL vs. UCO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PYPL
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
-26.79%-31.44%38.98%-13.77%-62.23%-19.48%116.51%28.64%14.22%86.52%
UCO
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil
149.12%-29.75%5.36%-13.89%39.71%139.26%-92.91%53.83%-43.26%0.34%

Correlation

The correlation between PYPL and UCO is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2015

0.12

The correlation between PYPL and UCO shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PYPL vs. UCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYPL
PYPL Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
PYPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYPL Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
PYPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYPL Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

UCO
UCO Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
UCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
UCO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
UCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
UCO Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYPL vs. UCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PYPLUCODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

1.32

-0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.80

3.49

-4.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.45

6.60

-8.05

PYPL vs. UCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYPL Sharpe Ratio is -1.03, which is lower than the UCO Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYPL and UCO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PYPLUCODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.03

2.12

-3.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.73

0.37

-1.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

-0.16

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

-0.34

+0.35

Drawdowns

PYPL vs. UCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYPL drawdown since its inception was -87.30%, smaller than the maximum UCO drawdown of -99.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYPL and UCO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PYPLUCODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.30%

-99.95%

+12.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.92%

-34.77%

-15.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.34%

-50.38%

-6.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-87.30%

-67.24%

-20.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.30%

-98.75%

+11.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-86.12%

-99.23%

+13.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.63%

-85.49%

+49.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.53%

18.33%

+9.20%

Volatility

PYPL vs. UCO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) is 9.62%, while ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) has a volatility of 20.83%. This indicates that PYPL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PYPLUCODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.62%

20.83%

-11.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.64%

46.44%

-14.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.02%

57.11%

-18.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.08%

59.78%

-17.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.76%

71.36%

-32.60%

Dividends

PYPL vs. UCO - Dividend Comparison

PYPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, while UCO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
PYPL
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
0.66%0.24%
UCO
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PYPL and UCO have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UCO has higher volatility (20.83%) compared to PYPL (9.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYPL dropped -87.30% vs UCO's -99.95%.

UCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PYPL and UCO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer