PWV vs. PWB
PWV (Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF) and PWB (Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PWV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Dynamic Large Cap Value Intellidex Index (AMEX), while PWB is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dynamic Large Cap Growth Intellidex Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PWV returned 12.39%/yr vs 18.61%/yr for PWB. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PWV charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for PWB.
Performance
PWV vs. PWB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PWV achieves a 15.98% return, which is significantly lower than PWB's 26.79% return. Over the past 10 years, PWV has underperformed PWB with an annualized return of 12.39%, while PWB has yielded a comparatively higher 18.61% annualized return.
PWV
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- 2.93%
- YTD
- 15.98%
- 6M
- 15.58%
- 1Y
- 27.69%
- 3Y*
- 21.59%
- 5Y*
- 14.11%
- 10Y*
- 12.39%
PWB
- 1D
- -4.36%
- 1M
- 4.17%
- YTD
- 26.79%
- 6M
- 24.81%
- 1Y
- 42.75%
- 3Y*
- 32.92%
- 5Y*
- 17.17%
- 10Y*
- 18.61%
PWV vs. PWB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWV Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF | 15.98% | 19.65% | 14.48% | 10.36% | -1.16% | 29.06% | -3.77% | 29.84% | -14.12% | 16.98% |
PWB Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF | 26.79% | 24.94% | 31.04% | 30.61% | -25.81% | 19.58% | 31.89% | 24.68% | 0.88% | 30.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between PWV and PWB is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2005 | 0.72 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PWV and PWB has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PWV vs. PWB — Risk / Return Rank
PWV
PWB
PWV vs. PWB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) and Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PWV | PWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.36 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.86 | 3.55 | +3.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.94 | 14.75 | +8.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PWV vs. PWB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWV drawdown since its inception was -49.04%, smaller than the maximum PWB drawdown of -52.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWV and PWB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWV | PWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.04% | -52.58% | +3.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.05% | -12.11% | +8.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.31% | -22.10% | +7.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.36% | -31.41% | +15.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.67% | -32.36% | -5.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -4.36% | +4.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.48% | -8.22% | -1.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.21% | 2.91% | -1.70% |
Volatility
PWV vs. PWB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) is 3.42%, while Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) has a volatility of 10.34%. This indicates that PWV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PWB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PWV | PWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.42% | 10.34% | -6.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.04% | 17.43% | -10.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.57% | 20.72% | -11.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.33% | 21.41% | -7.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.15% | 20.91% | -3.76% |
PWV vs. PWB - Expense Ratio Comparison
PWV has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than PWB's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
PWV vs. PWB - Dividend Comparison
PWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, while PWB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWB Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.37% | 0.31% | 0.04% | 0.21% | 0.58% | 0.97% | 0.54% | 0.82% | 0.67% |
PWV Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF | 1.73% | 2.12% | 2.08% | 2.16% | 2.29% | 1.89% | 2.66% | 2.24% | 2.34% | 1.55% | 2.35% | 2.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PWV and PWB have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PWB has higher volatility (10.34%) compared to PWV (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWV dropped -49.04% vs PWB's -52.58%.
On 10-year performance, PWB leads with 18.61% vs 12.39% for PWV. On fees, PWB is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, PWV has been the lower-risk option at 3.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PWB has performed better with a 18.61% return vs 12.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PWB is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PWV.
PWV has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 0.00% for PWB.
PWV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while PWB is Large Cap Growth Equities. PWV tracks Dynamic Large Cap Value Intellidex Index (AMEX), while PWB tracks Dynamic Large Cap Growth Intellidex Index. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PWV and 0.56% for PWB.
PWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PWV and PWB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer