PWV vs. VTV
PWV (Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - PWV tracks the Dynamic Large Cap Value Intellidex Index (AMEX) while VTV tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PWV returned 12.39%/yr vs 12.95%/yr for VTV. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PWV charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VTV.
Performance
PWV vs. VTV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PWV achieves a 15.98% return, which is significantly higher than VTV's 14.47% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PWV having a 12.39% annualized return and VTV not far ahead at 12.95%.
PWV
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- 2.93%
- YTD
- 15.98%
- 6M
- 15.58%
- 1Y
- 27.69%
- 3Y*
- 21.59%
- 5Y*
- 14.11%
- 10Y*
- 12.39%
VTV
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 3.10%
- YTD
- 14.47%
- 6M
- 13.93%
- 1Y
- 27.19%
- 3Y*
- 18.66%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- 12.95%
PWV vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWV Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF | 15.98% | 19.65% | 14.48% | 10.36% | -1.16% | 29.06% | -3.77% | 29.84% | -14.12% | 16.98% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 14.47% | 15.27% | 15.95% | 9.32% | -2.09% | 26.53% | 2.33% | 25.66% | -5.47% | 17.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between PWV and VTV is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2005 | 0.95 |
The correlation between PWV and VTV shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (1 year) to 0.95 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PWV vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank
PWV
VTV
PWV vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PWV | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.47 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.86 | 4.30 | +2.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.94 | 16.20 | +6.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PWV vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWV drawdown since its inception was -49.04%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWV and VTV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWV | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.04% | -59.27% | +10.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.05% | -6.35% | +2.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.31% | -14.52% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.36% | -17.04% | +0.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.67% | -36.78% | -0.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -0.56% | +0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.48% | -7.85% | -1.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.21% | 1.68% | -0.47% |
Volatility
PWV vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) have volatilities of 3.42% and 3.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PWV | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.42% | 3.41% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.04% | 7.85% | -0.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.57% | 10.39% | -0.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.33% | 13.88% | +0.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.15% | 16.65% | +0.50% |
PWV vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PWV has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
PWV vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison
PWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than VTV's 1.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWV Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF | 1.73% | 2.12% | 2.08% | 2.16% | 2.29% | 1.89% | 2.66% | 2.24% | 2.34% | 1.55% | 2.35% | 2.42% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.83% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PWV and VTV have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PWV has higher volatility (3.42%) compared to VTV (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWV dropped -49.04% vs VTV's -59.27%.
On 10-year performance, VTV leads with 12.95% vs 12.39% for PWV. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.95% return vs 12.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PWV.
VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 1.73% for PWV.
PWV tracks Dynamic Large Cap Value Intellidex Index (AMEX), while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PWV and 0.04% for VTV.
PWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PWV and VTV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer