PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PWV vs. CAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PWV vs. CAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) and Caterpillar Inc. (CAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWV achieves a 14.78% return, which is significantly lower than CAT's 79.21% return. Over the past 10 years, PWV has underperformed CAT with an annualized return of 12.27%, while CAT has yielded a comparatively higher 33.19% annualized return.


PWV

1D
1.24%
1M
1.86%
YTD
14.78%
6M
14.57%
1Y
27.50%
3Y*
21.17%
5Y*
14.04%
10Y*
12.27%

CAT

1D
3.70%
1M
16.18%
YTD
79.21%
6M
76.27%
1Y
186.63%
3Y*
65.85%
5Y*
39.22%
10Y*
33.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PWV vs. CAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PWV
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF
14.78%19.65%14.48%10.36%-1.16%29.06%-3.77%29.84%-14.12%16.98%
CAT
Caterpillar Inc.
79.21%60.30%24.66%25.95%18.60%15.95%26.97%19.51%-17.56%75.03%

Correlation

The correlation between PWV and CAT is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2005

0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between PWV and CAT has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PWV vs. CAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWV
PWV Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
PWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWV Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
PWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWV Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

CAT
CAT Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
CAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWV vs. CAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) and Caterpillar Inc. (CAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PWVCATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.73

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.81

13.53

-6.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.78

44.33

-21.55

PWV vs. CAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PWV Sharpe Ratio is 2.90, which is lower than the CAT Sharpe Ratio of 5.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PWV and CAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PWV vs. CAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWV drawdown since its inception was -49.04%, smaller than the maximum CAT drawdown of -73.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWV and CAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PWVCATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.04%

-73.43%

+24.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.05%

-13.88%

+9.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.31%

-34.05%

+19.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.36%

-34.05%

+17.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.67%

-43.36%

+5.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.08%

0.00%

-1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.48%

-19.72%

+10.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.21%

4.23%

-3.02%

Volatility

PWV vs. CAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) is 3.30%, while Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) has a volatility of 12.90%. This indicates that PWV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PWVCATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.30%

12.90%

-9.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.99%

27.80%

-20.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.55%

35.49%

-25.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.33%

30.84%

-16.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.18%

31.03%

-13.85%

Dividends

PWV vs. CAT - Dividend Comparison

PWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, more than CAT's 0.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAT
Caterpillar Inc.
0.59%1.02%1.49%1.69%1.93%2.07%2.26%2.56%2.58%1.97%3.32%4.33%
PWV
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF
2.33%2.12%2.08%2.16%2.29%1.89%2.66%2.24%2.34%1.55%2.35%2.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


PWV and CAT have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CAT has higher volatility (12.90%) compared to PWV (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWV dropped -49.04% vs CAT's -73.43%.

CAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.30 vs 2.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PWV and CAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer