PWV vs. MGV
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV).
PWV and MGV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PWV is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Dynamic Large Cap Value Intellidex Index (AMEX). It was launched on Mar 3, 2005. MGV is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Large Cap Value Index. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007. Both PWV and MGV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PWV or MGV.
Performance
PWV vs. MGV - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PWV having a 20.00% return and MGV slightly higher at 20.62%. Over the past 10 years, PWV has underperformed MGV with an annualized return of 9.23%, while MGV has yielded a comparatively higher 10.72% annualized return.
PWV
20.00%
0.22%
7.08%
29.42%
10.74%
9.23%
MGV
20.62%
-0.93%
8.97%
28.88%
11.64%
10.72%
Key characteristics
| PWV | MGV | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.50 | 2.88 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.60 | 4.09 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.45 | 1.53 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.70 | 5.80 |
| Martin Ratio | 14.36 | 18.82 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.03% | 1.52% |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.66% | 9.93% |
| Max Drawdown | -49.04% | -56.31% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.15% | -1.65% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PWV vs. MGV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PWV has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than MGV's 0.07% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between PWV and MGV is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PWV vs. MGV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PWV vs. MGV - Dividend Comparison
PWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, less than MGV's 2.26% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWV Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF | 1.93% | 2.16% | 2.29% | 1.89% | 2.66% | 2.24% | 2.34% | 1.55% | 2.35% | 2.42% | 1.93% | 1.82% |
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 2.26% | 2.48% | 2.45% | 2.17% | 2.47% | 2.69% | 2.65% | 2.34% | 2.53% | 2.59% | 2.26% | 2.29% |
Drawdowns
PWV vs. MGV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWV drawdown since its inception was -49.04%, smaller than the maximum MGV drawdown of -56.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWV and MGV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PWV vs. MGV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) has a higher volatility of 4.42% compared to Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) at 3.68%. This indicates that PWV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.