PWB vs. PRF

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

PWB (Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF) and PRF (Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PWB is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dynamic Large Cap Growth Intellidex Index, while PRF is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PWB returned 18.44%/yr vs 13.70%/yr for PRF. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PWB charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for PRF.

Performance

PWB vs. PRF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) and Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWB achieves a 28.40% return, which is significantly higher than PRF's 15.03% return. Over the past 10 years, PWB has outperformed PRF with an annualized return of 18.44%, while PRF has yielded a comparatively lower 13.70% annualized return.

PWB

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 10.85%
• YTD: 28.40%
• 6M: 28.76%
• 1Y: 46.56%
• 3Y*: 34.40%
• 5Y*: 18.57%
• 10Y*: 18.44%

PRF

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 3.76%
• YTD: 15.03%
• 6M: 16.14%
• 1Y: 33.92%
• 3Y*: 21.48%
• 5Y*: 12.57%
• 10Y*: 13.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PWB vs. PRF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PWB Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF	28.40%	24.94%	31.04%	30.61%	-25.81%	19.58%	31.89%	24.68%	0.88%	30.71%
PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF	15.03%	18.33%	16.73%	15.72%	-7.79%	31.12%	7.78%	27.42%	-8.71%	16.01%

Correlation

The correlation between PWB and PRF is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2005	0.80

The correlation between PWB and PRF shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PWB vs. PRF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PWB	PRF
Technology	44.6%	20.9%
Industrials	15.9%	9.2%
Communication Services	10.9%	10.2%
Financial Services	10.3%	15.4%
Consumer Defensive	8.4%	6.3%
Consumer Cyclical	5.2%	9.1%
Healthcare	3.6%	11.7%
Utilities	1.6%	3.1%
Basic Materials	1.1%	3.4%
Energy	-	8.2%
Real Estate	-	2.5%

Return for Risk

PWB vs. PRF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWB

PWB Risk / Return Rank: 75
PWB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
PWB Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
PWB Omega Ratio Rank: 70
PWB Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
PWB Martin Ratio Rank: 83

PRF

PRF Risk / Return Rank: 90
PRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
PRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
PRF Omega Ratio Rank: 90
PRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
PRF Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWB vs. PRF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) and Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PWB	PRF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.53	3.21	-0.67
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.27	4.46	-1.19
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.58	-0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.95	5.18	-1.23
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.10	21.45	-4.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PWB vs. PRF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PWB Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the PRF Sharpe Ratio of 3.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PWB and PRF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PWB	PRF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.53	3.21	-0.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89	0.83	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89	0.78	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	0.48	+0.13

Drawdowns

PWB vs. PRF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWB drawdown since its inception was -52.58%, smaller than the maximum PRF drawdown of -60.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWB and PRF.

Drawdown Indicators

	PWB	PRF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.58%	-60.35%	+7.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.11%	-6.59%	-5.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.10%	-15.82%	-6.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.41%	-19.72%	-11.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.36%	-38.16%	+5.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.24%	-6.93%	-1.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.80%	1.59%	+1.21%

Volatility

PWB vs. PRF - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) has a higher volatility of 5.39% compared to Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) at 2.73%. This indicates that PWB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PWB	PRF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.39%	2.73%	+2.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.03%	7.76%	+7.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.48%	10.63%	+7.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.00%	15.18%	+5.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.71%	17.67%	+3.04%

PWB vs. PRF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PWB has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than PRF's 0.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

PWB vs. PRF - Dividend Comparison

PWB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF	1.38%	1.59%	1.78%	1.84%	2.01%	1.58%	1.97%	1.99%	2.25%	1.58%	2.17%	2.25%
PWB Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.08%	0.37%	0.31%	0.04%	0.21%	0.58%	0.97%	0.54%	0.82%	0.67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PWB and PRF in my portfolio?

PWB and PRF have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PWB or PRF?

PWB has higher volatility (5.39%) compared to PRF (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWB dropped -52.58% vs PRF's -60.35%.

Which ETF is better, PWB or PRF?

On 10-year performance, PWB leads with 18.44% vs 13.70% for PRF. On fees, PRF is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, PRF has been the lower-risk option at 2.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PWB or PRF?

Over the 10-year period, PWB has performed better with a 18.44% return vs 13.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PWB or PRF?

PRF is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for PWB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PWB or PRF?

PRF has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.00% for PWB.

What is the main difference between PWB and PRF?

PWB is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while PRF is Large Cap Value Equities. PWB tracks Dynamic Large Cap Growth Intellidex Index, while PRF tracks RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for PWB and 0.34% for PRF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PRF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.