PWB vs. IUSG
PWB (Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF) and IUSG (iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - PWB tracks the Dynamic Large Cap Growth Intellidex Index while IUSG tracks the S&P 900 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PWB returned 18.61%/yr vs 17.77%/yr for IUSG. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PWB charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for IUSG.
Performance
PWB vs. IUSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PWB achieves a 26.79% return, which is significantly higher than IUSG's 9.19% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PWB having a 18.61% annualized return and IUSG not far behind at 17.77%.
PWB
- 1D
- -4.36%
- 1M
- 4.17%
- YTD
- 26.79%
- 6M
- 24.81%
- 1Y
- 42.75%
- 3Y*
- 32.92%
- 5Y*
- 17.17%
- 10Y*
- 18.61%
IUSG
- 1D
- -2.31%
- 1M
- -1.86%
- YTD
- 9.19%
- 6M
- 7.87%
- 1Y
- 26.96%
- 3Y*
- 25.00%
- 5Y*
- 13.77%
- 10Y*
- 17.77%
PWB vs. IUSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWB Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF | 26.79% | 24.94% | 31.04% | 30.61% | -25.81% | 19.58% | 31.89% | 24.68% | 0.88% | 30.71% |
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 9.19% | 21.23% | 34.70% | 29.28% | -28.81% | 31.26% | 32.65% | 30.62% | -0.79% | 27.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between PWB and IUSG is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2005 | 0.93 |
The correlation between PWB and IUSG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PWB vs. IUSG — Risk / Return Rank
PWB
IUSG
PWB vs. IUSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PWB | IUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.28 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.55 | 2.07 | +1.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.75 | 8.45 | +6.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PWB vs. IUSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWB drawdown since its inception was -52.58%, smaller than the maximum IUSG drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWB and IUSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWB | IUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.58% | -63.41% | +10.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.11% | -13.07% | +0.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.10% | -22.28% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.41% | -32.21% | +0.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.36% | -32.35% | -0.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.36% | -5.23% | +0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.22% | -21.40% | +13.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 3.20% | -0.29% |
Volatility
PWB vs. IUSG - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) has a higher volatility of 10.34% compared to iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) at 7.16%. This indicates that PWB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PWB | IUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.34% | 7.16% | +3.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.43% | 13.66% | +3.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.72% | 16.92% | +3.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.41% | 21.06% | +0.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.91% | 20.48% | +0.43% |
PWB vs. IUSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
PWB has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
PWB vs. IUSG - Dividend Comparison
PWB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IUSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 0.50% | 0.53% | 0.59% | 1.12% | 1.07% | 0.59% | 0.93% | 1.64% | 1.32% | 1.28% | 1.48% | 1.29% |
PWB Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.37% | 0.31% | 0.04% | 0.21% | 0.58% | 0.97% | 0.54% | 0.82% | 0.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PWB and IUSG have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PWB has higher volatility (10.34%) compared to IUSG (7.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWB dropped -52.58% vs IUSG's -63.41%.
On 10-year performance, PWB leads with 18.61% vs 17.77% for IUSG. On fees, IUSG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IUSG has been the lower-risk option at 7.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PWB has performed better with a 18.61% return vs 17.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IUSG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for PWB.
IUSG has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.00% for PWB.
PWB tracks Dynamic Large Cap Growth Intellidex Index, while IUSG tracks S&P 900 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for PWB and 0.04% for IUSG.
PWB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PWB and IUSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer