PWB vs. SMH
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH).
PWB and SMH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PWB is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Dynamic Large Cap Growth Intellidex Index. It was launched on Mar 3, 2005. SMH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011. Both PWB and SMH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PWB or SMH.
Correlation
The correlation between PWB and SMH is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
PWB vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
PWB:
1.98
SMH:
1.14
PWB:
2.65
SMH:
1.63
PWB:
1.36
SMH:
1.21
PWB:
3.15
SMH:
1.60
PWB:
12.51
SMH:
4.01
PWB:
2.53%
SMH:
9.87%
PWB:
15.96%
SMH:
34.89%
PWB:
-52.58%
SMH:
-95.73%
PWB:
-5.39%
SMH:
-13.97%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PWB achieves a 31.78% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 38.38% return. Over the past 10 years, PWB has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 13.85%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 27.66% annualized return.
PWB
31.78%
-0.79%
8.50%
33.44%
15.04%
13.85%
SMH
38.38%
0.19%
-12.56%
39.14%
30.59%
27.66%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PWB vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
PWB has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PWB vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PWB vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
PWB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while SMH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWB Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.01% | 0.37% | 0.31% | 0.03% | 0.21% | 0.58% | 0.97% | 0.54% | 0.82% | 0.67% | 0.43% | 0.42% |
SMH VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF | 0.00% | 0.60% | 2.37% | 1.02% | 1.38% | 6.00% | 3.75% | 2.85% | 1.61% | 4.28% | 2.31% | 3.11% |
Drawdowns
PWB vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWB drawdown since its inception was -52.58%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -95.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWB and SMH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PWB vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) is 5.32%, while VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 7.57%. This indicates that PWB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.