PWR vs. LMB
PWR (Quanta Services, Inc.) and LMB (Limbach Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Engineering & Construction industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, PWR returned 41.17%/yr vs 22.55%/yr for LMB. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PWR vs. LMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PWR achieves a 67.76% return, which is significantly higher than LMB's 1.59% return. Over the past 10 years, PWR has outperformed LMB with an annualized return of 41.17%, while LMB has yielded a comparatively lower 22.55% annualized return.
PWR
- 1D
- 3.58%
- 1M
- -8.53%
- YTD
- 67.76%
- 6M
- 61.62%
- 1Y
- 97.52%
- 3Y*
- 56.60%
- 5Y*
- 50.60%
- 10Y*
- 41.17%
LMB
- 1D
- -2.80%
- 1M
- 10.25%
- YTD
- 1.59%
- 6M
- 4.13%
- 1Y
- -44.24%
- 3Y*
- 50.98%
- 5Y*
- 52.40%
- 10Y*
- 22.55%
PWR vs. LMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 67.76% | 33.70% | 46.60% | 51.70% | 24.63% | 59.50% | 77.74% | 35.84% | -22.93% | 12.22% |
LMB Limbach Holdings, Inc. | 1.59% | -8.99% | 88.12% | 336.79% | 15.67% | -27.01% | 226.19% | 2.72% | -73.39% | -1.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between PWR and LMB is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2016 | 0.25 |
The correlation between PWR and LMB shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.42 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PWR:
$107.64B
LMB:
$954.43M
PWR:
$7.29
LMB:
$2.75
PWR:
97.08
LMB:
28.80
PWR:
4.81
LMB:
0.40
PWR:
3.58
LMB:
1.47
PWR:
11.90
LMB:
4.86
PWR:
$29.99B
LMB:
$652.56M
PWR:
$4.08B
LMB:
$163.77M
PWR:
$2.40B
LMB:
$58.72M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PWR vs. LMB — Risk / Return Rank
PWR
LMB
PWR vs. LMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) and Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PWR | LMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 0.91 | +0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.73 | -0.79 | +6.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.09 | -1.14 | +19.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PWR vs. LMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWR drawdown since its inception was -97.07%, which is greater than LMB's maximum drawdown of -84.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWR and LMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWR | LMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.07% | -84.10% | -12.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.11% | -55.92% | +38.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.89% | -55.92% | +22.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.89% | -55.92% | +22.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.53% | -84.10% | +38.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.87% | -47.11% | +37.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.84% | -31.63% | -15.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.41% | 38.98% | -33.57% |
Volatility
PWR vs. LMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) is 13.07%, while Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) has a volatility of 18.28%. This indicates that PWR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PWR | LMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.07% | 18.28% | -5.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.74% | 56.99% | -26.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.12% | 66.31% | -29.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.79% | 62.70% | -26.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.78% | 63.28% | -29.50% |
Dividends
PWR vs. LMB - Dividend Comparison
PWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, while LMB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMB Limbach Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 0.06% | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.15% | 0.25% | 0.16% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.13% |
Financials
PWR vs. LMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Quanta Services, Inc. and Limbach Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PWR vs. LMB - Profitability Comparison
PWR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.11B and revenue of 7.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.1%.
LMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Limbach Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 31.17M and revenue of 138.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.5%.
PWR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 338.78M and revenue of 7.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.
LMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Limbach Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.13M and revenue of 138.86M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.8%.
PWR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a net income of 220.63M and revenue of 7.87B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.
LMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Limbach Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 4.38M and revenue of 138.86M, resulting in a net margin of 3.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PWR and LMB have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LMB has higher volatility (18.28%) compared to PWR (13.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWR dropped -97.07% vs LMB's -84.10%.
PWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PWR and LMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer