PWR vs. ACM
Compare and contrast key facts about Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) and AECOM (ACM).
Performance
PWR vs. ACM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PWR vs. ACM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 30.11% | 33.70% | 46.60% | 51.70% | 24.63% | 59.50% | 77.74% | 35.84% | -22.93% | 12.22% |
ACM AECOM | -10.75% | -9.91% | 16.67% | 9.77% | 10.72% | 55.38% | 15.42% | 62.75% | -28.67% | 2.17% |
Fundamentals
PWR:
$83.28B
ACM:
$11.19B
PWR:
$6.79
ACM:
$4.17
PWR:
80.81
ACM:
20.34
PWR:
4.00
ACM:
0.12
PWR:
2.93
ACM:
0.71
PWR:
9.32
ACM:
5.02
PWR:
$28.35B
ACM:
$15.96B
PWR:
$3.69B
ACM:
$1.23B
PWR:
$2.61B
ACM:
$1.19B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PWR achieves a 30.11% return, which is significantly higher than ACM's -10.75% return. Over the past 10 years, PWR has outperformed ACM with an annualized return of 37.93%, while ACM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.09% annualized return.
PWR
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- -2.50%
- YTD
- 30.11%
- 6M
- 32.55%
- 1Y
- 116.24%
- 3Y*
- 49.01%
- 5Y*
- 44.09%
- 10Y*
- 37.93%
ACM
- 1D
- 1.93%
- 1M
- -13.43%
- YTD
- -10.75%
- 6M
- -34.66%
- 1Y
- -7.60%
- 3Y*
- 1.16%
- 5Y*
- 6.50%
- 10Y*
- 11.09%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PWR vs. ACM — Risk / Return Rank
PWR
ACM
PWR vs. ACM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) and AECOM (ACM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PWR | ACM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.29 | -0.25 | +3.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.82 | -0.13 | +3.96 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 0.98 | +0.54 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.96 | -0.20 | +10.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.49 | -0.44 | +24.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PWR | ACM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.29 | -0.25 | +3.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.28 | 0.25 | +1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.15 | 0.36 | +0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.22 | +0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between PWR and ACM is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PWR vs. ACM - Dividend Comparison
PWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than ACM's 1.29% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 0.07% | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.15% | 0.25% | 0.16% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.13% |
ACM AECOM | 1.29% | 1.09% | 0.82% | 0.78% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PWR vs. ACM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWR drawdown since its inception was -97.07%, which is greater than ACM's maximum drawdown of -59.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWR and ACM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWR | ACM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.07% | -59.97% | -37.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.66% | -37.87% | +26.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.89% | -37.87% | +3.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.53% | -54.12% | +8.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.09% | -36.67% | +31.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.15% | -18.24% | -28.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.74% | 16.90% | -12.16% |
Volatility
PWR vs. ACM - Volatility Comparison
Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) has a higher volatility of 11.17% compared to AECOM (ACM) at 6.88%. This indicates that PWR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PWR | ACM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.17% | 6.88% | +4.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.43% | 25.64% | +0.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.55% | 30.54% | +5.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.66% | 25.85% | +8.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.20% | 30.87% | +2.33% |
Financials
PWR vs. ACM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Quanta Services, Inc. and AECOM. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PWR vs. ACM - Profitability Comparison
PWR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 985.00M and revenue of 7.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.6%.
ACM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, AECOM reported a gross profit of 280.99M and revenue of 3.83B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.3%.
PWR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 485.00M and revenue of 7.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.2%.
ACM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, AECOM reported an operating income of 222.05M and revenue of 3.83B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.8%.
PWR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a net income of 315.50M and revenue of 7.84B, resulting in a net margin of 4.0%.
ACM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, AECOM reported a net income of 159.26M and revenue of 3.83B, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.