PortfoliosLab logo
PWR vs. ACM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between PWR and ACM is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

PWR vs. ACM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) and AECOM (ACM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PWR:

0.61

ACM:

0.78

Sortino Ratio

PWR:

1.12

ACM:

1.27

Omega Ratio

PWR:

1.16

ACM:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

PWR:

0.84

ACM:

0.75

Martin Ratio

PWR:

2.09

ACM:

1.96

Ulcer Index

PWR:

13.61%

ACM:

9.62%

Daily Std Dev

PWR:

42.50%

ACM:

25.73%

Max Drawdown

PWR:

-97.07%

ACM:

-59.97%

Current Drawdown

PWR:

-4.90%

ACM:

-6.95%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PWR:

$50.85B

ACM:

$14.17B

EPS

PWR:

$6.18

ACM:

$4.67

PE Ratio

PWR:

55.53

ACM:

22.93

PEG Ratio

PWR:

2.13

ACM:

1.12

PS Ratio

PWR:

2.04

ACM:

0.88

PB Ratio

PWR:

6.83

ACM:

6.18

Total Revenue (TTM)

PWR:

$24.87B

ACM:

$16.05B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PWR:

$3.53B

ACM:

$1.14B

EBITDA (TTM)

PWR:

$2.24B

ACM:

$926.66M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWR achieves a 7.77% return, which is significantly higher than ACM's 1.90% return. Over the past 10 years, PWR has outperformed ACM with an annualized return of 27.80%, while ACM has yielded a comparatively lower 12.68% annualized return.


PWR

YTD

7.77%

1M

24.66%

6M

5.17%

1Y

25.87%

5Y*

61.74%

10Y*

27.80%

ACM

YTD

1.90%

1M

15.24%

6M

1.53%

1Y

20.06%

5Y*

28.51%

10Y*

12.68%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PWR vs. ACM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PWR is 7474
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PWR is 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PWR is 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PWR is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PWR is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PWR is 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

ACM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ACM is 7474
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ACM is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ACM is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ACM is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ACM is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ACM is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PWR vs. ACM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) and AECOM (ACM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PWR Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is comparable to the ACM Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PWR and ACM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

PWR vs. ACM - Dividend Comparison

PWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than ACM's 0.89% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
PWR
Quanta Services, Inc.
0.11%0.09%0.15%0.25%0.16%0.29%0.42%0.13%
ACM
AECOM
0.89%0.82%0.78%0.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PWR vs. ACM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWR drawdown since its inception was -97.07%, which is greater than ACM's maximum drawdown of -59.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWR and ACM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

PWR vs. ACM - Volatility Comparison

Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) has a higher volatility of 13.08% compared to AECOM (ACM) at 5.74%. This indicates that PWR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

PWR vs. ACM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Quanta Services, Inc. and AECOM. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20212022202320242025
6.23B
3.77B
(PWR) Total Revenue
(ACM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PWR vs. ACM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Quanta Services, Inc. and AECOM over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

6.0%8.0%10.0%12.0%14.0%16.0%20212022202320242025
13.4%
7.7%
(PWR) Gross Margin
(ACM) Gross Margin
PWR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 834.04M and revenue of 6.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.4%.

ACM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, AECOM reported a gross profit of 290.76M and revenue of 3.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.7%.

PWR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Quanta Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 239.08M and revenue of 6.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.8%.

ACM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, AECOM reported an operating income of 257.57M and revenue of 3.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.8%.

PWR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a net income of 144.26M and revenue of 6.23B, resulting in a net margin of 2.3%.

ACM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, AECOM reported a net income of 143.39M and revenue of 3.77B, resulting in a net margin of 3.8%.