PWR vs. ACM
Compare and contrast key facts about Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) and AECOM (ACM).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PWR or ACM.
Correlation
The correlation between PWR and ACM is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
PWR vs. ACM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
PWR:
2.13
ACM:
1.18
PWR:
2.89
ACM:
1.81
PWR:
1.38
ACM:
1.22
PWR:
4.46
ACM:
1.63
PWR:
13.45
ACM:
4.30
PWR:
5.12%
ACM:
6.00%
PWR:
32.26%
ACM:
21.87%
PWR:
-97.07%
ACM:
-59.97%
PWR:
-2.61%
ACM:
-6.65%
Fundamentals
PWR:
$49.81B
ACM:
$14.43B
PWR:
$5.43
ACM:
$3.75
PWR:
62.15
ACM:
29.05
PWR:
2.01
ACM:
1.11
PWR:
$17.12B
ACM:
$12.21B
PWR:
$2.26B
ACM:
$840.37M
PWR:
$1.41B
ACM:
$868.03M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PWR achieves a 6.81% return, which is significantly higher than ACM's 2.22% return. Over the past 10 years, PWR has outperformed ACM with an annualized return of 29.33%, while ACM has yielded a comparatively lower 15.81% annualized return.
PWR
6.81%
5.29%
30.60%
67.35%
52.78%
29.33%
ACM
2.22%
1.12%
21.31%
24.26%
17.80%
15.81%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PWR vs. ACM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
PWR
ACM
PWR vs. ACM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) and AECOM (ACM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PWR vs. ACM - Dividend Comparison
PWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than ACM's 0.84% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 0.11% | 0.09% | 0.15% | 0.25% | 0.16% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.13% |
ACM AECOM | 0.84% | 0.82% | 0.78% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PWR vs. ACM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWR drawdown since its inception was -97.07%, which is greater than ACM's maximum drawdown of -59.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWR and ACM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PWR vs. ACM - Volatility Comparison
Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) has a higher volatility of 9.13% compared to AECOM (ACM) at 5.31%. This indicates that PWR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
PWR vs. ACM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Quanta Services, Inc. and AECOM. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities