PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PWR vs. ACM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


PWRACM
YTD Return25.52%-0.98%
1Y Return59.83%17.10%
3Y Return (Ann)40.95%11.68%
5Y Return (Ann)51.08%23.23%
10Y Return (Ann)23.75%11.77%
Sharpe Ratio1.910.78
Daily Std Dev28.92%20.24%
Max Drawdown-97.07%-59.97%
Current Drawdown-0.25%-7.21%

Fundamentals


PWRACM
Market Cap$39.74B$12.67B
EPS$5.14$0.87
PE Ratio52.82106.95
PEG Ratio2.000.35
Revenue (TTM)$21.49B$15.35B
Gross Profit (TTM)$2.53B$945.47M
EBITDA (TTM)$1.75B$1.02B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between PWR and ACM is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

PWR vs. ACM - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, PWR achieves a 25.52% return, which is significantly higher than ACM's -0.98% return. Over the past 10 years, PWR has outperformed ACM with an annualized return of 23.75%, while ACM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.77% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


300.00%400.00%500.00%600.00%700.00%800.00%900.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
853.54%
341.20%
PWR
ACM

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Quanta Services, Inc.

AECOM

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PWR vs. ACM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) and AECOM (ACM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PWR
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PWR, currently valued at 1.91, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.91
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PWR, currently valued at 2.75, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.75
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PWR, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.35
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PWR, currently valued at 2.22, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.22
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PWR, currently valued at 6.50, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.006.50
ACM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ACM, currently valued at 0.78, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.78
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ACM, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.21
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ACM, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.15
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ACM, currently valued at 0.90, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.90
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ACM, currently valued at 2.91, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.002.91

PWR vs. ACM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PWR Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the ACM Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of PWR and ACM.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1.91
0.78
PWR
ACM

Dividends

PWR vs. ACM - Dividend Comparison

PWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than ACM's 0.88% yield.


TTM202320222021202020192018
PWR
Quanta Services, Inc.
0.13%0.15%0.25%0.16%0.29%0.42%0.13%
ACM
AECOM
0.88%0.78%0.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PWR vs. ACM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWR drawdown since its inception was -97.07%, which is greater than ACM's maximum drawdown of -59.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWR and ACM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.25%
-7.21%
PWR
ACM

Volatility

PWR vs. ACM - Volatility Comparison

Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) has a higher volatility of 8.00% compared to AECOM (ACM) at 5.46%. This indicates that PWR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
8.00%
5.46%
PWR
ACM

Financials

PWR vs. ACM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Quanta Services, Inc. and AECOM. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items