PWR vs. FLR

In the year-to-date period, PWR achieves a -9.02% return, which is significantly higher than FLR's -27.90% return. Over the past 10 years, PWR has outperformed FLR with an annualized return of 25.84%, while FLR has yielded a comparatively lower -4.20% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) and Fluor Corporation (FLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current PWR Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is higher than the FLR Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PWR and FLR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

PWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, while FLR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum PWR drawdown since its inception was -97.07%, roughly equal to the maximum FLR drawdown of -95.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWR and FLR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) is 16.00%, while Fluor Corporation (FLR) has a volatility of 20.19%. This indicates that PWR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Quanta Services, Inc. and Fluor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.