PUK vs. ALB

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Prudential plc (PUK) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB).

Performance

PUK vs. ALB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Prudential plc (PUK) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PUK vs. ALB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PUK Prudential plc	-7.43%	99.34%	-27.35%	-17.04%	-19.12%	-0.05%	-0.57%	27.95%	-28.44%	31.12%
ALB Albemarle Corporation	27.24%	67.72%	-39.50%	-32.80%	-6.63%	59.76%	105.39%	-3.28%	-38.89%	50.22%

Fundamentals

Market Cap PUK : $36.67B ALB : $21.13B
EPS PUK : $4.25 ALB : -$4.69
PS Ratio PUK : 1.10 ALB : 4.11
PB Ratio PUK : 2.46 ALB : 2.90
Total Revenue (TTM) PUK : $33.63B ALB : $5.14B
Gross Profit (TTM) PUK : $20.95B ALB : $668.72M
EBITDA (TTM) PUK : $15.89B ALB : $221.01M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PUK achieves a -7.43% return, which is significantly lower than ALB's 27.24% return. Over the past 10 years, PUK has underperformed ALB with an annualized return of 1.70%, while ALB has yielded a comparatively higher 12.16% annualized return.

PUK

• 1D: 3.83%
• 1M: -6.32%
• YTD: -7.43%
• 6M: 2.92%
• 1Y: 34.77%
• 3Y*: 3.43%
• 5Y*: -5.23%
• 10Y*: 1.70%

ALB

• 1D: 1.30%
• 1M: 0.73%
• YTD: 27.24%
• 6M: 122.64%
• 1Y: 153.65%
• 3Y*: -5.28%
• 5Y*: 4.79%
• 10Y*: 12.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PUK vs. ALB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PUK

PUK Risk / Return Rank: 77
PUK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
PUK Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
PUK Omega Ratio Rank: 73
PUK Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
PUK Martin Ratio Rank: 82

ALB

ALB Risk / Return Rank: 91
ALB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ALB Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
ALB Omega Ratio Rank: 87
ALB Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
ALB Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PUK vs. ALB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prudential plc (PUK) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PUK	ALB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.26	2.39	-1.12
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.75	2.63	-0.88
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.35	-0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.02	5.15	-3.13
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.64	12.66	-6.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PUK vs. ALB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PUK Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the ALB Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PUK and ALB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PUK	ALB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.26	2.39	-1.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.15	0.09	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.05	0.26	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.15	0.31	-0.16

Correlation

The correlation between PUK and ALB is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

PUK vs. ALB - Dividend Comparison

PUK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, more than ALB's 0.90% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PUK Prudential plc	1.87%	1.54%	2.64%	1.72%	1.28%	4.60%	1.70%	17.06%	3.71%	2.33%	3.50%	2.62%
ALB Albemarle Corporation	0.90%	1.15%	1.87%	1.11%	0.73%	0.67%	1.04%	2.01%	1.74%	1.00%	1.42%	2.07%

Drawdowns

PUK vs. ALB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PUK drawdown since its inception was -82.52%, roughly equal to the maximum ALB drawdown of -83.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PUK and ALB.

Drawdown Indicators

	PUK	ALB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.52%	-83.90%	+1.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.46%	-29.74%	+12.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.59%	-83.90%	+20.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.59%	-83.90%	+20.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.35%	-42.07%	+15.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.41%	-20.55%	-5.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.31%	12.09%	-6.78%

Volatility

PUK vs. ALB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Prudential plc (PUK) is 9.73%, while Albemarle Corporation (ALB) has a volatility of 16.32%. This indicates that PUK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PUK	ALB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.73%	16.32%	-6.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.54%	43.64%	-25.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.65%	64.79%	-37.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.60%	53.87%	-19.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.79%	47.65%	-10.86%

Financials

PUK vs. ALB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Prudential plc and Albemarle Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

PUK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Prudential plc reported a gross profit of 11.35B and revenue of 11.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

ALB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Albemarle Corporation reported a gross profit of 197.93M and revenue of 1.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.9%.

PUK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Prudential plc reported an operating income of 2.39B and revenue of 11.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.1%.

ALB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Albemarle Corporation reported an operating income of -217.39M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in an operating margin of -15.2%.

PUK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Prudential plc reported a net income of 1.99B and revenue of 11.35B, resulting in a net margin of 17.6%.

ALB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Albemarle Corporation reported a net income of -455.87M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in a net margin of -31.9%.