PUK vs. BHF
PUK (Prudential plc) and BHF (Brighthouse Financial, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Insurance - Life industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 5 years, PUK returned -4.26%/yr vs 5.08%/yr for BHF. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PUK vs. BHF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PUK achieves a -5.29% return, which is significantly lower than BHF's -3.94% return.
PUK
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- -3.58%
- YTD
- -5.29%
- 6M
- 0.53%
- 1Y
- 28.57%
- 3Y*
- 2.34%
- 5Y*
- -4.26%
- 10Y*
- 1.27%
BHF
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- YTD
- -3.94%
- 6M
- -5.04%
- 1Y
- 5.26%
- 3Y*
- 12.62%
- 5Y*
- 5.08%
- 10Y*
- —
PUK vs. BHF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PUK Prudential plc | -5.29% | 99.34% | -27.35% | -17.04% | -19.12% | -0.05% | -0.57% | 27.95% | -28.44% | 10.60% |
BHF Brighthouse Financial, Inc. | -3.94% | 34.87% | -9.22% | 3.22% | -1.02% | 43.07% | -7.71% | 28.71% | -48.02% | -16.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between PUK and BHF is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2017 | 0.48 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PUK and BHF has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
PUK:
$4.25
BHF:
-$1.50
PUK:
1.12
BHF:
0.48
PUK:
$33.63B
BHF:
$5.58B
PUK:
$20.95B
BHF:
$2.23B
PUK:
$15.89B
BHF:
$942.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PUK vs. BHF — Risk / Return Rank
PUK
BHF
PUK vs. BHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prudential plc (PUK) and Brighthouse Financial, Inc. (BHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PUK | BHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.11 | 0.10 | +1.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.63 | 0.81 | +0.82 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.11 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | 0.15 | +1.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.00 | 0.34 | +4.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PUK | BHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11 | 0.10 | +1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | 0.12 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | -0.03 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
PUK vs. BHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PUK drawdown since its inception was -82.52%, which is greater than BHF's maximum drawdown of -76.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PUK and BHF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PUK | BHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.52% | -76.93% | -5.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.46% | -26.89% | +9.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.78% | -31.14% | -17.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.59% | -35.19% | -28.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.64% | -11.09% | -13.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.38% | -33.01% | +6.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.96% | 11.82% | -5.86% |
Volatility
PUK vs. BHF - Volatility Comparison
Prudential plc (PUK) has a higher volatility of 11.42% compared to Brighthouse Financial, Inc. (BHF) at 2.80%. This indicates that PUK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PUK | BHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.42% | 2.80% | +8.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.11% | 7.00% | +14.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.80% | 54.02% | -28.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.83% | 43.41% | -8.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.80% | 48.84% | -12.04% |
Dividends
PUK vs. BHF - Dividend Comparison
PUK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, while BHF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BHF Brighthouse Financial, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PUK Prudential plc | 1.83% | 1.54% | 2.64% | 1.72% | 1.28% | 4.60% | 1.70% | 17.06% | 3.71% | 2.33% | 3.50% | 2.62% |
Financials
PUK vs. BHF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Prudential plc and Brighthouse Financial, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PUK vs. BHF - Profitability Comparison
PUK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prudential plc reported a gross profit of 11.35B and revenue of 11.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
BHF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brighthouse Financial, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
PUK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prudential plc reported an operating income of 2.39B and revenue of 11.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.1%.
BHF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brighthouse Financial, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
PUK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prudential plc reported a net income of 1.99B and revenue of 11.35B, resulting in a net margin of 17.6%.
BHF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brighthouse Financial, Inc. reported a net income of -766.00M and revenue of 1.53B, resulting in a net margin of -50.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PUK and BHF have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PUK has higher volatility (11.42%) compared to BHF (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PUK dropped -82.52% vs BHF's -76.93%.
PUK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PUK and BHF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer